On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 11:16, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> In case there is no EN, what is the process to add information about
> issues like this to the release notes? Something like "known issues",
> which those of us who read the release notes can stumble over and check?
Great question
> On 17. Jun 2024, at 20:34, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:54:29AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
>> It is currently possible to specify an IPv4 address without a
>> netmask/width to ifconfig or in rc.conf, e.g.:
>>
>>ifconfig_igb0="192.168.0.2"
>>
>> phk recently discovered[
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:54:29AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> It is currently possible to specify an IPv4 address without a
> netmask/width to ifconfig or in rc.conf, e.g.:
>
> ifconfig_igb0="192.168.0.2"
>
> phk recently discovered[1] that ifconfig chose a poor netmask/width
> when none was sp
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:54:29 -0400
Ed Maste wrote:
> It is currently possible to specify an IPv4 address without a
> netmask/width to ifconfig or in rc.conf, e.g.:
>
> ifconfig_igb0="192.168.0.2"
>
> phk recently discovered[1] that ifconfig chose a poor netmask/width
> when none was spec
It is currently possible to specify an IPv4 address without a
netmask/width to ifconfig or in rc.conf, e.g.:
ifconfig_igb0="192.168.0.2"
phk recently discovered[1] that ifconfig chose a poor netmask/width
when none was specified. This was not an intentional change in
defaults but rather a bug
