On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:15 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> On 12 Feb, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Might be an overheating. Today's nvme drives are notoriously flaky if you
> > run them without proper heat sink attached to it.
>
> I don't think it is a thermal problem. According to the drive health
> page,
On 12 Feb, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Might be an overheating. Today's nvme drives are notoriously flaky if you
> run them without proper heat sink attached to it.
I don't think it is a thermal problem. According to the drive health
page, the device temperature has never reached Temperature 2, whatev
On 12 Feb, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
>> I just upgraded my package build machine to:
>> FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #110 main-n268161-4015c064200e
>> from:
>> FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #106 main-n265953-a5ed6a815e38
>> and I've had two nvme-triggered
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> I just upgraded my package build machine to:
> FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #110 main-n268161-4015c064200e
> from:
> FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #106 main-n265953-a5ed6a815e38
> and I've had two nvme-triggered panics in the last day.
>
> nvme is be
Might be an overheating. Today's nvme drives are notoriously flaky if you
run them without proper heat sink attached to it.
-Max
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024, 4:28 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> I just upgraded my package build machine to:
> FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #110 main-n268161-4015c064200e
> from:
> Fr
On Feb 12, 2024, at 16:36, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 16:10, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 12:00, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> [Gack: I was looking at the wrong vintage of source code, predating
>>> your changes: wrong system used.]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2024, a
On Feb 12, 2024, at 16:10, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 12:00, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> [Gack: I was looking at the wrong vintage of source code, predating
>> your changes: wrong system used.]
>>
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 09
I just upgraded my package build machine to:
FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #110 main-n268161-4015c064200e
from:
FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #106 main-n265953-a5ed6a815e38
and I've had two nvme-triggered panics in the last day.
nvme is being used for swap and L2ARC. I'm not able to get a crash
dump, probably
On Feb 12, 2024, at 12:00, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Gack: I was looking at the wrong vintage of source code, predating
> your changes: wrong system used.]
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 09:32, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/9/24 8:13 PM, Mark Mi
On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:02, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:36:46AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Without a stack trace it is pretty much impossible to debug a panic like
>> this.
>> Do you have KDB_TRACE enabled in your kernel config? I'm also not sure how
>> the
>> PCI change
[Gack: I was looking at the wrong vintage of source code, predating
your changes: wrong system used.]
On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:41, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 09:32, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 2/9/24 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> Summary:
>>> pcib0: mem
>>> 0x7d50-0x7d50
In message <20240212193044.e089d...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes:
> In message <625e0ea4-9413-45ad-b05c-500833a1d...@freebsd.org>,
> tuexen@freebsd.o
> rg writes:
> > > On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:36, Alexander Leidinger =
> > wrote:
> > >=20
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > I got a coredump with so
On 2/12/24 13:44, Michael Butler wrote:
On 2/12/24 12:36, John Baldwin wrote:
[ .. trimmed .. ]
Short of a stack trace, you can at least use lldb or gdb to lookup
the source line associated with the faulting instruction pointer (as
long as it isn't in a kernel module), e.g. for gdb you would
In message <625e0ea4-9413-45ad-b05c-500833a1d...@freebsd.org>,
tuexen@freebsd.o
rg writes:
> > On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:36, Alexander Leidinger =
> wrote:
> >=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > I got a coredump with sources from 2024-02-10-144617 (GMT+0100):
> Hi Alexander,
>
> we are aware of this problem, but
On 2/12/24 12:36, John Baldwin wrote:
[ .. trimmed .. ]
Short of a stack trace, you can at least use lldb or gdb to lookup
the source line associated with the faulting instruction pointer (as
long as it isn't in a kernel module), e.g. for gdb you would use 'gdb
/boot/kernel/kernel' and then 'l
On Feb 12, 2024, at 09:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 2/9/24 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> Summary:
>> pcib0: mem 0x7d50-0x7d50930f
>> irq 80,81 on simplebus2
>> pcib0: parsing FDT for ECAM0:
>> pcib0: PCI addr: 0xc000, CPU addr: 0x6, Size: 0x4000
>> . . .
>> rman_manage_re
On 2/12/24 12:36, John Baldwin wrote:
On 2/10/24 2:09 PM, Michael Butler wrote:
I have stability problems with anything at or after this commit
(b377ff8) on an amd64 laptop. While I see the following panic logged, no
crash dump is preserved :-( It happens after ~5-6 minutes running in KDE
(X).
On 2/10/24 2:09 PM, Michael Butler wrote:
I have stability problems with anything at or after this commit
(b377ff8) on an amd64 laptop. While I see the following panic logged, no
crash dump is preserved :-( It happens after ~5-6 minutes running in KDE
(X).
Reverting to 36efc64 seems to work reli
On 2/9/24 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
Summary:
pcib0: mem 0x7d50-0x7d50930f
irq 80,81 on simplebus2
pcib0: parsing FDT for ECAM0:
pcib0: PCI addr: 0xc000, CPU addr: 0x6, Size: 0x4000
. . .
rman_manage_region: request: start 0x6, end
0x6000f
panic: Failed to
Hi,
I just got a kernel panic on my 15.0-CURRENT machine, with an
Assertion in sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c 2386
full log:
https://people.freebsd.org/~wosch/tmp/kernel-panic-tcp_subr-line-2386.png
OS: 15.0-CURRENT main-3e9515846f (10-Feb-2024, github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src)
Should I worry?
-Wolfram
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:36, Alexander Leidinger
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got a coredump with sources from 2024-02-10-144617 (GMT+0100):
Hi Alexander,
we are aware of this problem, but haven't found a way to reproduce it.
Do you know how to reproduce this?
Best regards
Michael
> ---snip---
> __
Hi,
I got a coredump with sources from 2024-02-10-144617 (GMT+0100):
---snip---
__curthread () at /space/system/usr_src/sys/amd64/include/pcpu_aux.h:57
57 __asm("movq %%gs:%P1,%0" : "=r" (td) : "n" (offsetof(struct
pcpu,
(kgdb) #0 __curthread () at
/space/system/usr_src/sys/amd64/inc
Hi,
dovecot (and no other program I use on this machine... at least not that I
notice it) segfaults in ld-elf.so.1 after an update from 2024-01-18-092730
to 2024-02-10-144617 (and now 2024-02-11-212006 in the hope the issue would
have been fixed by changes to libc/libsys since 2024-02-10-144617).
23 matches
Mail list logo