Re: Massive "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC

2022-05-04 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:03 PM Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > Hi. > > After updating src main git: f44280bf5fbb to git: 1599fc904d35, > with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC on kernel config file, > A plenty of "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" appear on console and dmesg. > > With quick look under src/sys/, bio_cmd = 0x5

Re: Massive "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC

2022-05-04 Thread Warner Losh
Sorry for the top post... However, which device(s) are you using? Warner On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:03 PM Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > Hi. > > After updating src main git: f44280bf5fbb to git: 1599fc904d35, > with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC on kernel config file, > A plenty of "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" ap

Massive "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC

2022-05-04 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
Hi. After updating src main git: f44280bf5fbb to git: 1599fc904d35, with options CAM_IOSCHED_DYNAMIC on kernel config file, A plenty of "Found bio_cmd = 0x5" appear on console and dmesg. With quick look under src/sys/, bio_cmd = 0x5 means BIO_FLUSH, and the printf() only appears on src/sys/cam/ca

Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current

2022-05-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 5/4/22 1:38 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:22:57PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 5/4/22 12:53 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:12:55AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: I don't know the entire FreeBSD ecosystem. Do people use FreeBSD on embedded systems (e.g.,

Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current

2022-05-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:22:57PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On 5/4/22 12:53 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:12:55AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > I don't know the entire FreeBSD ecosystem. Do people > > use FreeBSD on embedded systems (e.g., nanobsd) where > > libth

Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current

2022-05-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 5/4/22 12:53 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:12:55AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 5/2/22 10:37 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:32:25PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 11:54, Steve Kargl wrote: diff --git a/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h b/gcc/

Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current

2022-05-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:12:55AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On 5/2/22 10:37 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:32:25PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 11:54, Steve Kargl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h b/gcc/config/free

Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current

2022-05-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 5/2/22 10:37 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:32:25PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 11:54, Steve Kargl wrote: diff --git a/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h b/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h index 594487829b5..1e8ab2e1827 100644 --- a/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h +++ b/gcc/c

Re: is gptzfsboot relevant on arm64?

2022-05-04 Thread f451
On Wed, 4 May 2022, at 13:21, Warner Losh wrote: > No. It's not relevant for ARM 64. It's only relevant for BIOS systems, > which are exclusive i386/amd64. Thanks for the explanation. Would you think it worthwhile for me to (I don't know where or precisely how yet) update the output so it notes t

Re: is gptzfsboot relevant on arm64?

2022-05-04 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:13 AM f451 wrote: > Hello, > > On arm64 I have this:- > > % uname -KU > 1400057 1400057 > % man 8 gptzfsboot > No manual entry for gptzfsboot > % > > Is gptzfsboot only for certain archs? I only query it because recently > zpool offered an > upgrade and suggested looking

is gptzfsboot relevant on arm64?

2022-05-04 Thread f451
Hello, On arm64 I have this:- % uname -KU 1400057 1400057 % man 8 gptzfsboot No manual entry for gptzfsboot % Is gptzfsboot only for certain archs? I only query it because recently zpool offered an upgrade and suggested looking at it. I see that man 8 gptzfsboot is available on 13-stable on

Re: breaking modules

2022-05-04 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Allan Jude wrote: > On 5/3/2022 2:05 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> From: bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org > >> Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 17:20:14 + > >> To: j...@berklix.com > >> > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263758 > >> > >> Li-Wen Hsu changed: > >> > >> What

Re: Testing 14-CURRENT-f44280bf5fb on aarch64

2022-05-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 5/4/22 09:49, Daniel Morante wrote: I'm still using the sysctl option "hw.usb.disable_enumeration=1" to prevent the USB devices from disconnecting/reconnecting every few seconds.  Other than that the improvement in stability with 14-CURRENT on aarach64 on this hardware is much better since t

Testing 14-CURRENT-f44280bf5fb on aarch64

2022-05-04 Thread Daniel Morante
I have been testing 14-CURRENT-f44280bf5fb for the last few days and so far it's been okay on my hardware (Cavium ThunderX2). Most of the details of the system are saved in http://venus.morante.net/downloads/unibia/screenshots/freebsd/R281-T91/14-CURRENT-f44280bf5fb. I've only had one kernel pa