Re: lib/libufs: build regressed after b366ee486

2021-12-03 Thread Evgeniy Khramtsov via FreeBSD-CURRENT
> dropping https://github.com/DankBSD/ports/commit/56cb9dc72 and Err, the right commit: https://github.com/DankBSD/base/commit/52ff26f21

Re: lib/libufs: build regressed after b366ee486

2021-12-03 Thread Evgeniy Khramtsov via FreeBSD-CURRENT
> It appears that your build environment does not have the b366ee486 version > of /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h installed in /usr/include/ufs/ffs/fs.h. > > That would normally happen after your did a buildworld and installworld. > You should be able to fix your current compile failure by doing: > >

Re: Make etcupdate bootstrap requirement due to previous mergemaster usage more clear in handbook

2021-12-03 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 05:54:37 -0800 (PST) "Jeffrey Bouquet" wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:58:39 +0100, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > > On 03/12/2021 12:52, Yetoo Happy wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Quick Start* and follow the instructions and get to step > > > 7 and ma

lib/libufs: build regressed after b366ee486

2021-12-03 Thread Evgeniy Khramtsov via FreeBSD-CURRENT
I was updating from commit 20aa359773befc8182f6b5dcb5aad7390cab6c26 Author: Dimitry Andric Date: Sat Nov 13 21:02:29 2021 +0100 Bump __FreeBSD_version for llvm-project 13.0.0 merge PR: 258209 MFC after: 2 weeks to commit b366ee4868bca2b3ebe4bb29c9590a29b6cecc29

Re: FYI: aarch64 main [so: 14] buildkernel (debug): ctfconvert: failed to get mapping for tid ?????

2021-12-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
On 2021-Dec-3, at 07:58, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:45:19PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> For: >> >> uname -apKU >> FreeBSD CA72_4c8G_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 >> main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 >> root@CA

Re: FYI: aarch64 main [so: 14] buildkernel (debug): ctfconvert: failed to get mapping for tid ?????

2021-12-03 Thread Mark Johnston
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:45:19PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > For: > > uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_4c8G_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 > main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 > root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/ma

Re: Make etcupdate bootstrap requirement due to previous mergemaster usage more clear in handbook

2021-12-03 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:58:39 +0100, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > On 03/12/2021 12:52, Yetoo Happy wrote: > > [...] > > > Quick Start* and follow the instructions and get to step > > 7 and may think that even though etcupdate is different from mergemaster > > from the last time

Re: [REVIEW] Hide BIT_* macros from userland code

2021-12-03 Thread Shawn Webb
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:03:54AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.12.21 um 17:46 schrieb Shawn Webb: > > Hey Stefan, > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > >> I have created > >> > >>https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33235 > >> > >> to remove the BIT_* macros us

Re: Make etcupdate bootstrap requirement due to previous mergemaster usage more clear in handbook

2021-12-03 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 03/12/2021 12:52, Yetoo Happy wrote: [...] Quick Start* and follow the instructions and get to step 7 and may think that even though etcupdate is different from mergemaster from the last time they used the handbook they have faith that following the instructions won't brick their system. Th

Make etcupdate bootstrap requirement due to previous mergemaster usage more clear in handbook

2021-12-03 Thread Yetoo Happy
In https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/cutting-edge/ I can see that at* 24.5.6.1 Merging Configuration Files* are instructions to bootstrap etcupdate if switching from mergemaster. This is really convenient and really useful, *EXCEPT* for that fact that it is placed in a part of the handbook

Re: [REVIEW] Hide BIT_* macros from userland code

2021-12-03 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 02.12.21 um 17:46 schrieb Shawn Webb: > Hey Stefan, > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: >> I have created >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33235 >> >> to remove the BIT_* macros used in the kernel from the userland API. >> >> They conflict with differing def