Re: failure of pructl (atexit/_Block_copy/--no-allow-shlib-undefined)

David Chisnall wrote this message on Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:34 +: > On 02/12/2021 09:51, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Apparently the "block runtime" is supposed to provide the actual object, > > so I guess you have to explicitly link to that runtime? > > The block runtime provides this symbol.

Re: [REVIEW] Hide BIT_* macros from userland code

Hey Stefan, On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > I have created > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33235 > > to remove the BIT_* macros used in the kernel from the userland API. > > They conflict with differing definitions in some 3rd party code and > lead to comp

[REVIEW] Hide BIT_* macros from userland code

I have created https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33235 to remove the BIT_* macros used in the kernel from the userland API. They conflict with differing definitions in some 3rd party code and lead to compile issues in a number of ports (via CPU_* macros based on the BIT_* macros). See PR2597

Re: failure of pructl (atexit/_Block_copy/--no-allow-shlib-undefined)

On 02/12/2021 09:51, Dimitry Andric wrote: Apparently the "block runtime" is supposed to provide the actual object, so I guess you have to explicitly link to that runtime? The block runtime provides this symbol. You use this libc API, you must be compiling with a toolchain that supports block

Re: Problem compiling ports

Confirmed. Thanks for your quick reaction! On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:37 + Brooks Davis wrote: > Yeah, I've got this in progress. > > -- Brooks > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:57:56AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > It would be better making new special handling like BE_AMDGPU for it. > > Bui

Re: failure of pructl (atexit/_Block_copy/--no-allow-shlib-undefined)

On 2 Dec 2021, at 06:42, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:05 PM John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> It seems like the recent changes to make --no-allow-shlib-undefined >> broke pructl. >> >> lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c uses a weak _Block_copy symbol, but >> pructl does not use

Re: failure of pructl (atexit/_Block_copy/--no-allow-shlib-undefined)

On 2 Dec 2021, at 06:42, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:05 PM John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> It seems like the recent changes to make --no-allow-shlib-undefined >> broke pructl. >> >> lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c uses a weak _Block_copy symbol, but >> pructl does not u

sys/conf: Simplify configuration files

Hi fellow kernel developers, I have two patches for config(8) which will allow us to group filenames in sys/conf/files* among others. Any strong opinions about the following change? https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33224 --HPS