Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> I have two 12.2-R systems where the serial console is attached to a terminal
> server.
>
> When there are no TCP connections to the terminal server, getty soaks up 1.5%
> of the
> CPU in the kernel (sleeping in "ttyin"), ktrace shows no system calls.
>
> When
I have two 12.2-R systems where the serial console is attached to a terminal
server.
When there are no TCP connections to the terminal server, getty soaks up 1.5%
of the
CPU in the kernel (sleeping in "ttyin"), ktrace shows no system calls.
When a TCP connection is made to the terminal server,
On 05.04.21 18:17, Yuri Pankov wrote:
- in /etc/rc.conf:
zfs_enabled="YES"
If this is exactly what you have in rc.conf, then it's the problem -- it
should be "enable", not "enabled".
This fixed the issue, thank you!
--
xpetrl
___
freebsd-current@fr
> On 6. Apr 2021, at 19:02, Rodney W. Grimes
> wrote:
>
>> 06.04.2021 19:54, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
05.04.2021 19:44, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>>> As I understand, in some cases remote host does not reply with MSS
>>> option, and host behind router continue use mss 8960, that dropp
On 06/04/21 18:59, Filippo Moretti via freebsd-current wrote:
After moving ports to git I had the following error while updating libgit2:===>
Extracting for libgit2-1.1.0
=> ===> Extracting for libgit2-1.1.0
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for libgit2-1.1.0.tar.gz.
===> Patching for libgit2-1.1.0
sed:
> 06.04.2021 19:54, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >> 05.04.2021 19:44, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
> >>
> > As I understand, in some cases remote host does not reply with MSS
> > option, and host behind router continue use mss 8960, that dropped
> > by router.
> If the peer does not provide a
After moving ports to git I had the following error while updating libgit2:===>
Extracting for libgit2-1.1.0
=> ===> Extracting for libgit2-1.1.0
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for libgit2-1.1.0.tar.gz.
===> Patching for libgit2-1.1.0
sed:
/usr/ports/devel/libgit2/work/libgit2-1.1.0/cmake/Modules/Selec
06.04.2021 19:54, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> 05.04.2021 19:44, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>>
> As I understand, in some cases remote host does not reply with MSS
> option, and host behind router continue use mss 8960, that dropped
> by router.
If the peer does not provide an MSS option,
> 05.04.2021 19:44, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>
> >>> As I understand, in some cases remote host does not reply with MSS
> >>> option, and host behind router continue use mss 8960, that dropped
> >>> by router.
> >> If the peer does not provide an MSS option, your local FreeBSD based
> >> host should u
05.04.2021 19:44, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>>> As I understand, in some cases remote host does not reply with MSS
>>> option, and host behind router continue use mss 8960, that dropped
>>> by router.
>> If the peer does not provide an MSS option, your local FreeBSD based
>> host should use an MSS of n
10 matches
Mail list logo