Re: testers needed: loader: use display pixel density for font autoselection

2021-02-25 Thread Toomas Soome via freebsd-current
> On 26. Feb 2021, at 05:42, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> On 23. Feb 2021, at 17:53, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >>> >>> On 2/23/21 12:27 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: hi! I have done some work to make font pickup a bit smarter (hopefully better;), but my own a

Re: testers needed: loader: use display pixel density for font autoselection

2021-02-25 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> > On 23. Feb 2021, at 17:53, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > > > On 2/23/21 12:27 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: > >> hi! > >> > >> I have done some work to make font pickup a bit smarter (hopefully > >> better;), but my own ability to test is limited to one bugged supermicro > >> an

KTLS with zfs recv

2021-02-25 Thread Alan Somers
My understanding is that KTLS works very well with OpenSSL for sending, but not as well for receiving, because there's nothing like a recvfile syscall. However, it works great for both send and receive with NFS, where all the data remains in the kernel. What about zfs recv? A very common pattern

Re: HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 21:22:43 -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 19:23, John Kennedy wrote: >> >> Not sure if Ed Maste just wants to make sure that all the executables >> are rebuilt as PIE (vs hit-and-miss) or there is a sneaker corner-case that >> he knows about. > > T

Re: HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread Ed Maste
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 19:23, John Kennedy wrote: > > Not sure if Ed Maste just wants to make sure that all the executables > are rebuilt as PIE (vs hit-and-miss) or there is a sneaker corner-case that > he knows about. The issue is that without a clean build you may have some .o files left aro

Re: HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread Ed Maste
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 18:10, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > This details worries me. How compatible are PIE executables with > non-PIE executables? Can I run PIE executables on older systems? Can > I run older executables on a PIE system? There is no issue mixing PIE and non-PIE binaries, and

Re: HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread John Kennedy
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:10:28AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 15:58:07 -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > > As of 9a227a2fd642 (main-n245052) base system binaries are now built > > as position-independent executable (PIE) by default, for 64-bit > > architectures. ...

Re: (n244517-f17fc5439f5) svn stuck forever in /usr/ports?

2021-02-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 2/11/21 9:59 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 07:21:20 +0100 "Hartmann, O." wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:15:38 -0800 John Baldwin wrote: On 2/9/21 2:16 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:34:24 +0100 Guido Falsi via freebsd-current wrote: On 03/02/21 17:02,

Re: HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 15:58:07 -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > As of 9a227a2fd642 (main-n245052) base system binaries are now built > as position-independent executable (PIE) by default, for 64-bit > architectures. PIE executables are used in conjunction with address > randomization as a mitiga

HEADS-UP: PIE enabled by default on main

2021-02-25 Thread Ed Maste
As of 9a227a2fd642 (main-n245052) base system binaries are now built as position-independent executable (PIE) by default, for 64-bit architectures. PIE executables are used in conjunction with address randomization as a mitigation for certain types of security vulnerabilities. If you track -CURREN

Re: zpool upgrade can't enable new features

2021-02-25 Thread Martin Matuska
I have submitted a pull request to fix this in OpenZFS: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/11653 On 25. 2. 2021 17:20, John Kennedy wrote: On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:09:17AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: I recently upgraded a CURRENT system to main-n244932-248a47a4c2f and zpool status shows:

Re: zpool upgrade can't enable new features

2021-02-25 Thread Martin Matuska
Looks like Ryan didn't think it all the way through in: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/35ec51796f0aa8d4fe322b48e7d1d5a65e38a4ce I am preparing a patch for OpenZFS. On 25. 2. 2021 17:20, John Kennedy wrote: On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:09:17AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: I recently upgrad

Re: zpool upgrade can't enable new features

2021-02-25 Thread John Kennedy
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:09:17AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: > I recently upgraded a CURRENT system to main-n244932-248a47a4c2f and > zpool status shows: > >pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > status: Some supported and requested features are not enabled on the pool. > The pool can st

zpool upgrade can't enable new features

2021-02-25 Thread Renato Botelho
I recently upgraded a CURRENT system to main-n244932-248a47a4c2f and zpool status shows: pool: zroot state: ONLINE status: Some supported and requested features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Enable all features usin