On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> what do people think about adding
> setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
> to dtrace's main function?
That seems reasonable to me.
> My primary interest is to (pretty-)print some numbers with a thousands
> separator.
>
> Not sure if a
On 19/11/2020 15:31, Ash Gokhale wrote:
> I'm not a fan of reading nanosecond timestamps ; however This would add work
> to
> downstream scripts that have to toss the prettyprint later;
> s|.,()||g downstream. Think of the wee awk scripts.
> Could we gate the behaviour behind an environment DT
what do people think about adding
setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
to dtrace's main function?
My primary interest is to (pretty-)print some numbers with a thousands
separator.
Not sure if any other LC_ types are worth bothering.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
f
