I have confirmed that r365487 is the last kernel that will boot on my
2400G. These are the files changed between r365487 and r365488:
Usys/vm/phys_pager.c
Usys/vm/vm_object.c
Usys/vm/vm_object.h
Usys/vm/vm_pager.h
On 9/18/20 8:57 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Hi,
I am AFK until S
The following patch is an opimization for he kernels
used by cexp(x) and cexpf(x).
. Use sincos[f] instead of a call to cos[f] and a
call to sin[f].
. While here, alphabetize declaration.
--- /usr/src/lib/msun/src/k_exp.c 2019-02-23 07:45:03.879997000 -0800
+++ src/k_exp.c 2019-12-26 08:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 04:58:49PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> The following patch fixes the ld80 and ld128 kernels for expl(x).
Subj: is slightly wrong. This fixes the cexpl(z) kernels.
> I can't test ld128, so that patch is untested.
>
> . Micro-optimization: use sincosl(x) instead of a call
The following patch fixes the ld80 and ld128 kernels for expl(x).
I can't test ld128, so that patch is untested.
. Micro-optimization: use sincosl(x) instead of a call to cosl(x) and
a call to sinl(x). Argument reduction is done once not twice.
. Use a long double constant instead of an invalid
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020, 2:44 PM Lucas Nali de Magalhães
wrote:
> Just My 2¢…
>
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:32 PM Chris wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-03 11:33, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
> On 3 Sep 2020, at 19:56, Chris wrote:
>
> Why was the intention to s
Just My 2¢…
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:32 PM Chris wrote:
>
>>> On 2020-09-03 11:33, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> On 3 Sep 2020, at 19:56, Chris wrote:
Why was the intention to switch NOT announced as such MUCH sooner?
>>> There was
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:04 PM Ed Maste wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 15:07, Chris wrote:
> >
> > While contemplating a massive re-tooling job ahead to accommodate
> > any/all changes when freebsd fully lands in git. I ran across this[1][2]
> > and wondered if it may be of any assistance fo
Actually, frankly, yes. Nearly the first cogent summary I've found so far.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 2:22 AM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 11:31 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>
>> Hrm. Maybe what I hear others saying, tho, and not entirely being
>> replied to is just a nice con
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020, 10:05 AM Bakul Shah wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2020, at 11:21 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > These are the main ones. The three down sides are lack of $FreeBSD$
> support
> > and tags in general.
>
> Can a git hook be used for this?
>
No. Not really. There is an extension to git
Bakul Shah wrote in
:
|On Sep 18, 2020, at 11:21 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
|>
|> These are the main ones. The three down sides are lack of $FreeBSD$ \
|> support
|> and tags in general.
|
|Can a git hook be used for this?
I use a git pre-commit hook to fake-update SCCS IDs for my web
site (
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 12:06, Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> The cgit-beta.FreeBSD.org and github trees are not identical the last
> time I looked (mainly in meta data). Any reason for not keeping them
> identical? I switched from the github tree to the cgit-beta tree.
The current GitHub mirror is missing
On Sep 18, 2020, at 11:21 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> These are the main ones. The three down sides are lack of $FreeBSD$ support
> and tags in general.
Can a git hook be used for this?
>
> Yes. I've started doing a series of short videos explaining the change, why
> we are doing it and what to
I've taken the time to clean up this email (which I wrote on my phone last
thing yesterday) and expand it a little.
https://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html
is the result. I'm planning on doing a number of videos about this, as well
as blog posts, FreeBSD Journ
13 matches
Mail list logo
