e latest image.
>> >
>> > Additionally, the following FUSE-related ports don't have maintainers.
>> > If you use one of them, or know somebody who does, please test them on
>> > current, and consider adopting the port:
>> > deskutils/kdeconnect-kde
&g
, please test them on
> > > current, and consider adopting the port:
> > > deskutils/kdeconnect-kde
> > > devel/gvfs
> > > devel/py-fusefs
> > > sysutils/fusefs-afuse
> > > sysutils/fusefs-chironfs
s.
> > If you use one of them, or know somebody who does, please test them on
> > current, and consider adopting the port:
> > deskutils/kdeconnect-kde
> > devel/gvfs
> > devel/py-fusefs
> > sysutils/fusefs-afuse
> > sysutils/fusefs-chironfs
> > sysutil
opting the port:
>> deskutils/kdeconnect-kde
>> devel/gvfs
>> devel/py-fusefs
>> sysutils/fusefs-afuse
>> sysutils/fusefs-chironfs
>> sysutils/fusefs-cryptofs
>> sysutils/fusefs-funionfs
>> sysuti
utils/fusefs-s3backer
> sysutils/fusefs-sqlfs
> sysutils/fusefs-zip
> sysutils/p5-Brackup
> sysutils/p5-Fuse
>
> VM images:
> http://ftp0.nyi.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAGES/13.0-CURRENT/amd64/20190808/
> ISOs: http://ftp0.nyi.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ISO
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:34:52PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> The new FUSE driver has just landed in current. It raises the protocol
> level from 7.8 to 7.23, fixes many bugs, adds a test suite for the
> driver, and adds many new features. New features include:
Thanks for sharing your work!
--
Read the bug report. I can't even load modules when I build with GCOV.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:04 PM Matthew Macy wrote:
>
> The whole point of adding gcov support was for integrating with the
> ZoL CI framework which does coverage. So it very much does work with
> modules. Not sure where that
afuse
sysutils/fusefs-chironfs
sysutils/fusefs-cryptofs
sysutils/fusefs-funionfs
sysutils/fusefs-fusepak
sysutils/fusefs-httpfs
sysutils/fusefs-s3backer
sysutils/fusefs-sqlfs
sysutils/fusefs-zip
sysutils/p5-Brackup
sysutils/p5-Fuse
VM images:
http://ftp0.nyi.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAG
On 7/30/19 2:53 AM, weike.c...@dell.com wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Cy Schubert
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:49 AM
>> To: Chen, Alvin W
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: kgdb assert while loading a kernel core
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>
>> In message
>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0300, Vladimir Zakharov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 08:10:43PM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 06:02-0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:53:04PM +0
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:52, Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
>>>
>>> Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> We are looking for an alternative for kernel module
On 08-Aug-19 18:14, Michael Tuexen wrote:
On 8. Aug 2019, at 16:16, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
On 08-Aug-19 16:52, Alan Somers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen wrote:
On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for F
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 16:16, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08-Aug-19 16:52, Alan Somers wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
>>
On 08-Aug-19 16:52, Alan Somers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen wrote:
On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
Mostly interested
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
> >
> > Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
> >
> > We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
> > Mostly interested in code coverage (fo
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman wrote:
>
> Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
>
> We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
> Mostly interested in code coverage (for now).
>
> Any suggestions that work for you?
Have you looked int
In message , Slava Shwartsman
writes:
>Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
>
>We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
>Mostly interested in code coverage (for now).
>
>Any suggestions that work for you?
Back in early days, I fixed it so
Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
Mostly interested in code coverage (for now).
Any suggestions that work for you?
Slava
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org maili
18 matches
Mail list logo
