Re: LLD: man pages missing?

2017-12-26 Thread Ed Maste
On 25 December 2017 at 15:25, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Since lld is now approaching a quite usable state, maybe it is time for > a request to upstream to provide [a manpage]. ;) Yes, it would've been nice if an upstream man page was created early on and had been kept up to date as features were

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Steven Hartland
Yes it does know how to figure out based on stripe size On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 20:25, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 09:31:53 -0800 (PST) > "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb: > > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 09:31:53 -0800 (PST) "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann > > wrote: > > > > > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 > > > Allan Jude schrieb: > > > > > > > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > Running recent CURRENT

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Steven Hartland
You only need to set the min if the drives hide their true sector size, as Allan mentioned. camcontrol identify is one of the easiest ways to check this. If the pool reports ashift 12 then zfs correctly detected the drives as 4K so that part is good On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 20:15, Rodney W. Grime

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > > > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 > > Allan Jude schrieb: > > > > > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to > > replace and > > > > restore a ZFS RAIDZ pool

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 10:13:09 -0700 Alan Somers schrieb: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > > > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 > > Allan Jude schrieb: > > > > > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I w

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 Allan Jude schrieb: > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to replace > > and > > restore a ZFS RAIDZ pool. Doing so, I was in need to partition the disks I > > was about > > to replace. W

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Alan Somers
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 > Allan Jude schrieb: > > > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to > replace and > > > restore a ZFS RAIDZ pool. Doing so, I was in

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:44:29 -0500 Allan Jude schrieb: > On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to replace > > and > > restore a ZFS RAIDZ pool. Doing so, I was in need to partition the disks I > > was about > > to replace. W

[SOLVED] Re: LLD_IS_LD: error compiling world after switch: incompatible with /usr/lib/crt1.o ...

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:36:27 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > On to boxes running almost the same CURRENT (non-working is at FreeBSD > 12.0-CURRENT #241 > r327182: Mon Dec 25 22:45:06 CET 2017 amd64; the working one is at r327183) I > dared, > again, to flip the switch LLD_IS_LD=YES. > > On the

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Allan Jude
On 2017-12-26 11:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to replace > and restore a > ZFS RAIDZ pool. Doing so, I was in need to partition the disks I was about to > replace. > Well, the drives in question are 4k block size drives with 512b emulat

ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Running recent CURRENT on most of our lab's boxes, I was in need to replace and restore a ZFS RAIDZ pool. Doing so, I was in need to partition the disks I was about to replace. Well, the drives in question are 4k block size drives with 512b emulation - as most of them today. I've created the onl

LLD_IS_LD: error compiling world after switch: incompatible with /usr/lib/crt1.o ...

2017-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
On to boxes running almost the same CURRENT (non-working is at FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #241 r327182: Mon Dec 25 22:45:06 CET 2017 amd64; the working one is at r327183) I dared, again, to flip the switch LLD_IS_LD=YES. On the box in question building world magically stops and dumping an error somet