On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:51:54 -0500 "Allan Jude" said
On 12/14/2017 00:47, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> When you boot into FreeBSD and you can select kernels, there's only 2
> options:
> default and kernel.old
>
> Is there a way to have better output and support multiple kernels without
> having t
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:47:13 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said
When you boot into FreeBSD and you can select kernels, there's only 2
options:
default and kernel.old
Is there a way to have better output and support multiple kernels without
having to login to the system and running uname -v or someth
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 00:47, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> > When you boot into FreeBSD and you can select kernels, there's only 2
> > options:
> > default and kernel.old
> >
> > Is there a way to have better output and support multiple kernels without
> >
On 2017-Dec-13, at 9:43 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2017-Dec-13 11:23:46 +, Gary Palmer wrote:
>> An open question would be why ARC is not reducing if the system is
>> under memory pressure. It's meant to, but there have been various
>> bugs in that implementation.
>
> The OP doesn't say
On 12/14/2017 00:47, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> When you boot into FreeBSD and you can select kernels, there's only 2
> options:
> default and kernel.old
>
> Is there a way to have better output and support multiple kernels without
> having to login to the system and running uname -v or something li
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2017-Dec-13 11:23:46 +, Gary Palmer wrote:
> >An open question would be why ARC is not reducing if the system is
> >under memory pressure. It's meant to, but there have been various
> >bugs in that implementation.
>
> The OP doesn't
When you boot into FreeBSD and you can select kernels, there's only 2
options:
default and kernel.old
Is there a way to have better output and support multiple kernels without
having to login to the system and running uname -v or something like that?
Would it be possible to add options for more k
On 2017-Dec-13 11:23:46 +, Gary Palmer wrote:
>An open question would be why ARC is not reducing if the system is
>under memory pressure. It's meant to, but there have been various
>bugs in that implementation.
The OP doesn't say what version of -current he is running but I would
point the f
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 21:39, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Am Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:47:53 -0800 (PST)
> "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
>
>>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:58:28 -0800
>>> Cy Schubert wrote:
>>>
There are a couple of ways you can address this. You'll need to
offline the vdev first. If
Am Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:47:53 -0800 (PST)
"Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:58:28 -0800
> > Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> > > There are a couple of ways you can address this. You'll need to
> > > offline the vdev first. If you've done a smartcrl -t long and if the
> > > test fa
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:58:28 -0800
> Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> > There are a couple of ways you can address this. You'll need to
> > offline the vdev first. If you've done a smartcrl -t long and if the
> > test failed, smartcrl -a will tell you which block it had an issue
> > with. You can use dd,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:58:28 -0800
Cy Schubert wrote:
> There are a couple of ways you can address this. You'll need to
> offline the vdev first. If you've done a smartcrl -t long and if the
> test failed, smartcrl -a will tell you which block it had an issue
> with. You can use dd, ddrescue or d
> Am Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:55:49 -0800 (PST)
> "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
> > > Am Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:52:27 -0800 (PST)
> > > "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
> > >
> > > Thank you for answering that fast!
Not so fast this time, had to sleep :)
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > running CURRENT
Am Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:55:49 -0800 (PST)
"Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
> > Am Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:52:27 -0800 (PST)
> > "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb:
> >
> >
> > Thank you for answering that fast!
> >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > running CURRENT (recent r326769), I realised that smartmond se
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 1:26, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Rodney W. Grimes <
> freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>
>> Hum, just noticed this. 25k hours power on, 2M load cycles, this is
>> very hard on a hard drive. Your drive is going into power save mode
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:34:02AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com wrote on
> > Tue Dec 12 15:58:19 UTC 2017 :
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:34 PM, blubee blubeeme > > >wrote:
> > > > I am see
16 matches
Mail list logo
