This was from an amd64 -> arm64.aarch64 cross build context and was an
attempt to build a debug kernel.
# uname -apKU
FreeBSD FreeBSDx64OPC 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r323246M amd64 amd64
1200043 1200043
# svnlite info /usr/src/ | grep "Re[plv]"
Relative URL: ^/head
Repository Root: svn
I use 11-STABLE with Intel. Some time ago, there was a switch
to drm2 here.
Iirc I had to add kld_list="i915kms.ko to rc.conf and ensure
that drm2/drm2 and drm2/i915kms are built (which should
be default).
Are you sure you are not using drm2 already? I would check
with kldstat. The message in
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 01:15:31AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum
>> length) and have any experience with it?
>>
>> We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-sy
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum length)
> and have any experience with it?
>
> We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-system compatibility
> would probably be ok, and we have our own filesyst
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 01:15:31AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum
> length) and have any experience with it?
>
> We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-system
> compatibility would probably be ok, and we have our o
Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum
length) and have any experience with it?
We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-system
compatibility would probably be ok, and we have our own filesystem
which would support it.
But I wonder if anyone has tried
