-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 3rd Quarter 2016
As focused as we are on the present and what is happening now, it is
sometimes useful to take a fresh look at where we have come from, and
where we are going. This quarter, we had o
Am Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:41:07 +0300
"Andrey V. Elsukov" schrieb:
> On 13.11.2016 12:23, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Great, thank you. I would first like to confirm that r307234 is indeed
> > causing the crash - since it appears to be easy to trigger, that should
> > be faster. If not, the c
I have a Lenovo X1 yoga, which should be pretty similar to 4th gen X1
Carbon.
I'm running 12-CURRENT with with drm-next-47 bits and corresponding
xorg-next.
I have graphics running fine good enough. There are some yet to be resolved
crashes of gtk-apps, and libreoffice makes X segfault.
Both wir
On 11/11/2016 14:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> panic: mutex sbp not owned at /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:967
> cpuid = 2
> curthread: 0xf8000ada5000
> stack: 0xfe0504ded000 - 0xfe0504df1000
> stack pointer: 0xfe0504df0a00
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0xff
On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Mark Heily wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Oberman > wrote:
>
> >
> > In regard to video, have you installed and are you using vaapi?
> >
>
> vaapi appears to be preinstalled, however when I run "vainfo" it is unable
> to find a driver.
>
> The un
* Stefan Hagen wrote:
> * Suspend does now work
Typo: Suspend does NOT work!
Bye,
Stefan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...
* Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback on the X1 Carbon. Does anyone have experience with
> the T460s?
I own an x260 on 11.0-RELEASE at the moment, which is pretty much the
same hardware.
* WIFI works pretty well with the iwm driver.
* GPU works in a very basic and unaccelerated way wi
The machine managed to survive 21 hours of building FreeBSD 12 ports.
All of the panic happened while building FreeBSD 10 ports, which build
faster. That may be enough to affect timing and affect the likelyhood
of a race condition triggering the panic.
On 13 Nov, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, No
Thanks for the feedback on the X1 Carbon. Does anyone have experience with
the T460s?
On Nov 11, 2016 12:25, "Jeremie Le Hen" wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm about to purchase a new laptop, one of the two mentioned in the
> subject.
>
> I'm looking for reports of hardware support for both of them unde
On 11/13/16 18:43, Daniel Campos do Nascimento wrote:
Hello,
First time posting on a mailing list...
I currently have 11.0-STABLE installed on my laptop which has a Core
i7-6500U. I can't get Xorg-server to work neither with xf86-driver-intel,
nor with i915kms driver; I'm falling back on the sc
Hello,
First time posting on a mailing list...
I currently have 11.0-STABLE installed on my laptop which has a Core
i7-6500U. I can't get Xorg-server to work neither with xf86-driver-intel,
nor with i915kms driver; I'm falling back on the scfb driver. I would like
to know how the situation is wit
Am Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:41:07 +0300
"Andrey V. Elsukov" schrieb:
> On 13.11.2016 12:23, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Great, thank you. I would first like to confirm that r307234 is indeed
> > causing the crash - since it appears to be easy to trigger, that should
> > be faster. If not, the c
On 13.11.2016 12:23, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Great, thank you. I would first like to confirm that r307234 is indeed
> causing the crash - since it appears to be easy to trigger, that should
> be faster. If not, the core will help track down the real problem.
Although I was unde
Am Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:11:37 +0300
"Andrey V. Elsukov" schrieb:
> On 08.11.2016 21:28, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:13:56AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Great, thank you. I would first like to confirm that r307234 is indeed
> >>> causing the crash - since it appears to
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> This !neg_locked code in cache_negative_remove() looks suspicious to me:
>
> if (!neg_locked) {
> if (ncp->nc_flag & NCF_HOTNEGATIVE) {
> hot_locked = true;
> mtx_lo
15 matches
Mail list logo
