panic: [pmc,1473] pp_pmcval outside of expected range cpu=2 ri=17
pp_pmcval=fa529f5b pm_reloadcount=1
(kgdb) p pp->pp_pmcs[17].pp_pmc->pm_state
$2 = PMC_STATE_DELETED
Those are interesting bits. The counter is logically stopped and the value read
from the hardware is small (become h
On 2016-Nov-7, at 8:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> This is just in case any of the information happens to prove
> useful/interesting.
> I'm not expecting any assistance.
>
> Note: After the crash ddb was not responding to input so this is all that I
> have.
>
> Note: This was an experiment with
As I have told before, this card is from completely different price
segment then proper SAS/SATA HBAs. For its $80 it is not promised to be
reliable. But in case anything can be done, I'll try to take a look on
it in couple weeks when I get one and return home.
On 07.11.2016 16:19, Daniel Engber
Gentlefolk,
I have run into a problem building a FreeBSD 9 world & kernel on a
FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT host.
I have my FreeBSD 9 tree located in /usr/src-9 which was refreshed via svn
yesterday.
The build is being executed on a host running FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r308389 .
The steps that were fol
This is just in case any of the information happens to prove useful/interesting.
I'm not expecting any assistance.
Note: After the crash ddb was not responding to input so this is all that I
have.
Note: This was an experiment with head -r308247 but was built like stable for
performance iss
On 2016-Nov-7, at 1:16 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:19:24PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> It looks like http://pkg.freebsd.org is still back as of head being
>> 11-CURRENT: http://pkg.freebsd.org shows only
>
> Correct. I wrote up some details on how to use the 11 package
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:53:46 -0500
Ryan Stone wrote:
> I just got the following error attempting to build r308430 with my
> source tree on a read-only NFS mount. I can work around it for now,
> but shouldn't the source tree be untouched during a buildworld?
>
> $ make -j4 buildworld buildkernel
I just got the following error attempting to build r308430 with my source
tree on a read-only NFS mount. I can work around it for now, but shouldn't
the source tree be untouched during a buildworld?
$ make -j4 buildworld buildkernel
--- buildworld ---
make[1]: "/repos/users/rstone/freebsd/Makefil
Hi,
I discussed this card briefly with Alexander Motin (@mav) back in 2015,
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/50411/page-2#post-282648 .
I've CCed him for suggestions.
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2016-October/063668.html
Best regards,
Daniel
__
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:19:24PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> It looks like http://pkg.freebsd.org is still back as of head being
> 11-CURRENT: http://pkg.freebsd.org shows only
Correct. I wrote up some details on how to use the 11 packages here:
http://www.raspbsd.org/raspberrypi.html
Rega
On 2016-11-07 15:19, Mark Millard wrote:
> It looks like http://pkg.freebsd.org is still back as of head being
> 11-CURRENT: http://pkg.freebsd.org shows only
>
> • freebsd:11:aarch64:64
>
> (as http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd%3A11%3Aaarch64%3A64 ).
>
> So on 12-CURRENT pkg bootstrapping g
It looks like http://pkg.freebsd.org is still back as of head being 11-CURRENT:
http://pkg.freebsd.org shows only
• freebsd:11:aarch64:64
(as http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd%3A11%3Aaarch64%3A64 ).
So on 12-CURRENT pkg bootstrapping gets:
> # pkg
> The package management tool is not yet
12 matches
Mail list logo
