Sean, to the issue that you are describing it is also might be possible to
do it some other way around. One, perhaps more portable, is to share a
connected socketpair between two communicating processes, so that you can
do non-blocking read on one of its ends from time to time and check if it
retur
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 02:13:24AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
> disk images have been uploaded to the FTP mirrors.
>
There have been a few reports of "missing" files on the FTP mirrors.
This happened last week with the i386 MA
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 05:35:31PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:26:45 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 05:17:14PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> Is there a way to salvage the situation without relying on "customized"
> >> third party kernels?
Ok
Lets try this again with my source changed to my @freebsd.net :-)
Now I am also attaching a patch for you Gleb, this will take some poking to
get in to your NF-head since it incorporates some changes we made earlier.
I think this will fix the problem.. i.e. dealing with two locks in the callo
Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 17:35:31 +0200
Tijl Coosemans schrieb:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:26:45 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 05:17:14PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> Is there a way to salvage the situation without relying on "customized"
> >> third party kernels?
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:26:45 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 05:17:14PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Is there a way to salvage the situation without relying on "customized"
>> third party kernels?
>>
>> I usually use /bin/csh - so this might be of use.
>
> You need ei
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 05:17:14PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:35:44 +0300
> Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:18:06PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:02:38 +0300
> > > Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
> > >
> > > > On Fri,
Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:35:44 +0300
Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:18:06PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:02:38 +0300
> > Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:50:34PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > pipe(2) had
Am Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:51:11 +
Brooks Davis schrieb:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:00:19AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:07:51 +
> > Brooks Davis schrieb:
> >
> > > Kernel config minimalists and those running aarch64 and riscv systems will
> > > want to head this
Glen Barber wrote:
|On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:02:11PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>| A selection of system daemons, including:
|>| fingerd,
|>| ftpd,
|>|- rlogind,
|>|- rshd, and
|>|- sshd have been modified to support
|>|+ rlogind, and
|>|+ rshd have been mod
It appears that the i386 cross-build is broken as follows. Builds on native
amd64 are OK.
--- main.o ---
cc -target i386-unknown-freebsd11.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/i386.i386/opt/src/svn
-current/tmp -B/usr/obj/i386.i386/opt/src/svn-current/tmp/usr/bin -O2 -pipe
-pipe -DRDUMP -g -MD -MF.depend.mai
On 2016-06-25 12:16, Guy Yur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:49:39AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:03:13AM +0300, Guy Yur wrote:
libtdb.so.1`tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes +
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:02:11PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |Author: gjb
> |Date: Fri Jun 24 23:42:33 2016
>
> Sigh.
>
> |Log:
> | Update the release notes following r302182.
>
> | A selection of system daemons, including:
> | fingerd,
> | ftpd,
> |- rlogind,
> |- rs
|Author: gjb
|Date: Fri Jun 24 23:42:33 2016
Sigh.
|Log:
| Update the release notes following r302182.
| A selection of system daemons, including:
| fingerd,
| ftpd,
|- rlogind,
|- rshd, and
|- sshd have been modified to support
|+ rlogind, and
|+ rshd have be
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:18:06PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:02:38 +0300
> Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:50:34PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > pipe(2) had an unnecessarily odd calling convention (ignoring the
> > > argument the user thou
So
All of our timers in TCP do something like
-
INFO-LOCK
INP_WLOCK
if (inp needs to be dropped) {
drop-it
}
do other work
UNLOCK-INP
UNLOCK-INFO
--
And generally the path “inp needs to be dropped” is rarely taken.
So why don’t we change the procedure to
Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:02:38 +0300
Konstantin Belousov schrieb:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:50:34PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > pipe(2) had an unnecessarily odd calling convention (ignoring the
> > argument the user thought they were passing and returning the two file
> > descriptors via the
On 2016-Jun-25, at 12:44 AM, Ngie Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2016-Jun-24, at 2:50 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
>>
>>> As of r302180., the usr.sbin/rpcbind, sys/acl, and sys/sys/bitstring
>>> tests should all be fixed. I opened PR 210329 for the
>>> us
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:49:39AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:03:13AM +0300, Guy Yur wrote:
>> > libtdb.so.1`tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes + 1475 at mutex.c:957
>> > ...
>>
>> The pointe
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:49:39AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:03:13AM +0300, Guy Yur wrote:
> > libtdb.so.1`tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes + 1475 at mutex.c:957
> > ...
>
> The pointer to tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes() appeared to be
> most useful,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:03:13AM +0300, Guy Yur wrote:
> libtdb.so.1`tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes + 1475 at mutex.c:957
> ...
The pointer to tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes() appeared to be
most useful, thanks.
The two patches below should fix samba use of robustness. First,
kernel
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2016-Jun-24, at 2:50 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
>
>> As of r302180., the usr.sbin/rpcbind, sys/acl, and sys/sys/bitstring
>> tests should all be fixed. I opened PR 210329 for the
>> usr.bin/lastcomm test. I haven't investigated the others.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:50:34PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> pipe(2) had an unnecessarily odd calling convention (ignoring the
> argument the user thought they were passing and returning the two file
> descriptors via the two return registers). This required machine
> dependent assembly for eve
23 matches
Mail list logo
