I forgot to mention my kernel conf I'm not sure if it would cause this
issue, but I'll test again with GENERIC.
--- /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC 2016-02-22 21:05:37.152953000 -0500
+++ /root/MYKERNEL-11-CURRENT-AMD64 2015-12-28 19:18:22.893391452 -0500
@@ -91,6 +91,12 @@
options WITNESS_SK
I don't really have any ideas on the error -100. Error -100 means there was
a mailbox error, so something failed in the initial communications setup
between the PF and VF, but I don't know what exactly went wrong.
I'm grasping at straws, but try using a smaller number of VFs initially,
like 2? And
On 2016-02-20 06:08, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/20/16 06:19, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> ugen0.2: at usbus0
> Root mount waiting for: usbus0
> usbd_setup_device_desc: getting device descriptor at addr 2 failed,
USB_ERR_IOERROR
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> please try now.
>
> compiled, ok.
> and i need wrote some apps for forwarding from pipes to output
> interface?
just use multiple pkt-gen in read mode on the outputs,
and
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> >
> >> Give this a try and let us know.
> >
> > I can't compile this.
> >
> > # cc -o lb lb.c
> > lb.c:1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Give this a try and let us know.
>
> I can't compile this.
>
> # cc -o lb lb.c
> lb.c:17:10: fatal error: 'ctrs.h' file not found
> #include "ctrs.h"
> ^
> 1 er
Running CURRENT r295632.
# vmstat -m|grep routetbl
routetbl 103952 51995K - 155861 512,1024
This seems quite large for my dev build system.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/
Yeah, dmesg does show 48. 12 Cores and 24 threads each. 48 total
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
>
>
> On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
>
>> This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
>>
>> Ultima
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 201
isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
Jeff
-
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:
> owner-
Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ultima
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:02 PM
To: Eric Joyner
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; freebsd-v
Did you do an ifconfig up on ix1 before loading the VF driver?
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM Ultima wrote:
> Decided to do some testing with iovctl to see how sr-iov is coming along.
> Currently when adding the vf's there are a couple errors, and the network
> no longer function after iovctl
After reboot...
ifconfig ix1 up
dhclient ix1
DHCPDISCOVER on ix1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
DHCPOFFER from 192.168.1.1
DHCPREQUEST on ix1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.1.1
bound to 192.168.1.145 -- renewal in 21600 seconds.
ix0 down
ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Monday, February 22, 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > > lb
> > > a packet distributor that reads from a netmap port and distributes
> > > traffic to mul
On 2016-02-22 12:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 19:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-22 10:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 17:39, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
Yes. I have an eGa
On 02/22/16 19:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-22 10:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 17:39, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
Yes. I have an eGalax touchscreen and it's doing the same thing. T
On 2016-02-22 10:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 17:39, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
Yes. I have an eGalax touchscreen and it's doing the same thing.
The
number of items it's reporting is 256
On 02/22/2016 11:51 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 02/22/16 17:39, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
Yes. I have an eGalax touchscreen and it's doing the same thing. The
number of items it
On 02/22/16 17:39, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
Yes. I have an eGalax touchscreen and it's doing the same thing. The
number of items it's reporting is 256 (according to my preliminary
debugging), causing t
On 02/22/2016 02:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 02/22/16 03:16, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
>> Yes. I have an eGalax touchscreen and it's doing the same thing. The
>> number of items it's reporting is 256 (according to my preliminary
>> debugging), causing the warning. I think these things a
On Monday, February 22, 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > lb
> > a packet distributor that reads from a netmap port and distributes
> > traffic to multiple netmap ports, using zero copy and a user-defined
> > hash function.
On 19/02/2016 10:38, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 18/02/2016 17:13, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> So this is arguably a fallout from r188331.
>> The following is somewhat non-insistent attempt to fix the problem.
>
> Kostik,
>
> thank you very much, I am testing the patch.
The patch holds good so fa
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> lb
> a packet distributor that reads from a netmap port and distributes
> traffic to multiple netmap ports, using zero copy and a user-defined
> hash function. This will be useful e.g. for people running multiple
> instances o
23 matches
Mail list logo
