On 25.11.2015 4:31, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> 4) The whole processing looks overcomplicated and not effective. What
> about this instead?
> for (i = 0; i < 12; i++) {
> count wcswidth() of each month and store it in wab_months_width[].
> count max_width_month.
> }
> for (i = 0; i < 12; i++) {
On 25.11.2015 3:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:57:46PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> On 21.11.2015 15:18, Ed Schouten wrote:
>>> Hi Baptiste,
>>>
>>> I suppose you should use the wcswidth() function somewhere to compute
>>> the visible width of the month name. Some cha
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:15:13AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:57:46PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On 21.11.2015 15:18, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > > Hi Baptiste,
> > >
> > > I suppose you should use the wcswidth() function somewhere to compute
> > > the visible w
Hm, what's in your kenrel config file? Is ENABLE_11N or whatever the
ath driver option there?
sysctl dev.ath.0.txagg=1 ; then check dmesg and output me the results.
Thanks!
-a
On 24 November 2015 at 14:50, José Pérez wrote:
> Dear Svatopluk,
> tried again with current, and I get (almost) the
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:57:46PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 21.11.2015 15:18, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Hi Baptiste,
> >
> > I suppose you should use the wcswidth() function somewhere to compute
> > the visible width of the month name. Some characters may be
> > double-width, others may have
Dear Svatopluk,
tried again with current, and I get (almost) the same:
Nov 23 18:14:47 current kernel: ath0: ath_edma_rxbuf_alloc: nothing on
rxbuf?!
Nov 23 18:14:47 current kernel: ath0: ath_edma_rxfifo_alloc: Q1: alloc
failed: i=0, nbufs=128?
Nov 23 18:14:47 current kernel: ath0: ath_edma_rxbu
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance but what's the reason FreeBSD ships
OpenSSH patched with HPN by default? Besides my passion for
security, I've been working in the HPC sector for a while and
benchmarked the patch for a customer about 1.5 years ago. The
CTR-multi threading patch is actually *slower*
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:31:37 +0100, M&S - Krasznai András
wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> I experience the following errors:
>
>
> after setting up ccache according to the howto I tried to compile world and
> kernel.
>
>
>
> make buildworld
>
>
>
> runs correctly, takes appr. 3 hours to f
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:31:37 +0100, M&S - Krasznai András
wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> I experience the following errors:
>
>
> after setting up ccache according to the howto I tried to compile world and
> kernel.
>
>
>
> make buildworld
>
>
>
> runs correctly, takes appr. 3 hours to f
Good morning!
I experience the following errors:
after setting up ccache according to the howto I tried to compile world and
kernel.
make buildworld
runs correctly, takes appr. 3 hours to finish for the first run. Repeating it
finishes in a little less than 1 hour.
Make -j5 buildworld
10 matches
Mail list logo