Bryan Drewery wrote:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~bdrewery/patches/world-ccache.diff
In the Junos build - where we used ccache for quite some time
I did:
_CC := ${CC}
CC = ${CCACHE_ENV} ${_CC}
Since sometimes you want the compiler without ccache - eg when linking.
That needs to happen after C
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
> I just noticed that our last Coverity scan happened on either July-6
> (according to my inbox) or June-26 (according to Coverity's website).
> Prior to that, we seemed to get scanned about once per week. Does
> anybody know why we haven't been
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 06:09:37 PM Ed Maste wrote:
> On 11 February 2015 at 21:39, Glen Barber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Within the next 24 hours, I will merge the release-install-debug branch
> > into head, which will enable building and installing stripped debugging
> > files by default.
> >
I just got this crash while running poudriere on a freshly upgraded
11.0-CURRENT machine. The instruction pointer value looks pretty
strange.
FreeBSD zipper.catspoiler.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #30 r290039:
Tue Oct 27 00:08:00 PDT 2015
d...@zipper.catspoiler.org:/usr/obj/usr/sr
On 11 February 2015 at 21:39, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Within the next 24 hours, I will merge the release-install-debug branch
> into head, which will enable building and installing stripped debugging
> files by default.
>
> In general, this should have no significant impact, but any fallout w
On 10/27/15 16:50, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> On 10/27/15 13:50, Patrick Hess wrote:
>>> Michael Butler wrote:
Do you have "options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO" in your kernel config?
>>>
>>> I'm running GENERIC on all of those machines, and as far as I can tell,
>>> that option is not enabled by defa
Hi!
> On 10/27/15 13:50, Patrick Hess wrote:
> > Michael Butler wrote:
> >> Do you have "options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO" in your kernel config?
> >
> > I'm running GENERIC on all of those machines, and as far as I can tell,
> > that option is not enabled by default, at least on 10.1-RELEASE:
>
> I disc
On 10/27/15 13:50, Patrick Hess wrote:
> Michael Butler wrote:
>> Do you have "options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO" in your kernel config?
>
> I'm running GENERIC on all of those machines, and as far as I can tell,
> that option is not enabled by default, at least on 10.1-RELEASE:
I discovered that there are
I just noticed that our last Coverity scan happened on either July-6
(according to my inbox) or June-26 (according to Coverity's website).
Prior to that, we seemed to get scanned about once per week. Does
anybody know why we haven't been scanned for so long? I can't figure
out what triggers a sca
Michael Butler wrote:
> Do you have "options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO" in your kernel config?
I'm running GENERIC on all of those machines, and as far as I can tell,
that option is not enabled by default, at least on 10.1-RELEASE:
# config -x /boot/kernel/kernel | grep -i ahc
options AHC_REG_PRETT
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2015, at 12:06 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>> The thing I like most about encryption is that when I RMA a bad
>> drive, I don't have to worry about my data leaking if I am unable
>> to overwrite all the data...
> You are optimistic if you believe that. We ($W
On 10/27/15 16:49, John Baldwin wrote:
With MAKE_JUST_WORLDS you would only build
a "generic" module once per architecture. That savings is likely far more
than the cost of the additional tools.
I will try it out. Thanks for your hints and tips.
--HPS
___
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:06:41 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 10/26/15 19:03, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
> >> to only build the modu
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:00 +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 10/27/15 13:16, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky
> > wrote:
> > > I understand that the compilation environments are different.
> > >
> > > How would you suggest to build-
On 10/27/15 13:16, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I understand that the compilation environments are different.
How would you suggest to build-test a handful of C-files under a single
device keyword and associated kernel module cr
On 10/27/15 13:16, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I understand that the compilation environments are different.
How would you suggest to build-test a handful of C-files under a single
device keyword and associated kernel module cr
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> I understand that the compilation environments are different.
>
> How would you suggest to build-test a handful of C-files under a single
> device keyword and associated kernel module cross all kernels we have in
> a 10-minut
On 10/26/15 19:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
to only build the modules.
What do you th
On 10/26/15 19:03, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
to only build the modules.
What do you think about the following patch:
diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/
19 matches
Mail list logo
