On Oct 24, 2015, at 12:06 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> The thing I like most about encryption is that when I RMA a bad
> drive, I don't have to worry about my data leaking if I am unable
> to overwrite all the data...
You are optimistic if you believe that. We ($WORK) factor the cost of
DOA/
On 10/18/15 17:37, Patrick Hess wrote:
[ .. ]
> I can send you a full verbose dmesg if that's of any help to you.
>
>> "Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning."
>> when given any significant load :-(
>
> Just extracted an entire ports tree on that machine with no iss
On 26 October 2015 at 11:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
>> > to only bui
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
> > to only build the modules.
> >
> > What do you think about the following
On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
> to only build the modules.
>
> What do you think about the following patch:
>
> > diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
>
On Monday, October 26, 2015 04:38:21 AM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello NGie,
> >
> > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
> >> `ifconfig_` is being overload
+1 to this thankyou!
-adrian
On 26 October 2015 at 02:11, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL to
> only build the modules.
>
> What do you think about the following patch:
>
>> diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/
On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello NGie,
>
> Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
>> `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though
>> ifconfig itself doesn’t support
Hi,
We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
to only build the modules.
What do you think about the following patch:
diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
index ddf828e..f0920df 100644
--- a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
+++ b/sys/conf/kern.post.m
> > It looks like a problem with WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS.
> > I am looking into it.
> A fix is now committed. It has been broken since June.
> Regards,
> Bryan Drewery
Thanks for the fix, computer is now busy with NetBSD update from 6.99.44 (16
months old) to 7.99.21 for both amd64 and i386, but
Hello NGie,
Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
> `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though
> ifconfig itself doesn’t support hostap — only `wlanmode ap`). I don’t
ifconfig doesn't support
11 matches
Mail list logo
