Re: Add isboot iSCSI boot driver to FreeBSD

2015-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > I have removed these header files in 0.2.11 release. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203324 > > is the suggested update from 0.2.10 to 0.2.11, if maintainer also approves ? Committed, thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 y

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

2015-09-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Sep, Matt Smith wrote: > On Sep 25 01:00, Don Lewis wrote: >>On 25 Sep, Matt Smith wrote: >>> On Sep 24 21:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! > > > Try dropping the attached patch in net/mediatomb/files. I > > > submitted it in March, in PR198436: > > > > > > https://bugs.fr

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

2015-09-25 Thread Matt Smith
On Sep 25 01:00, Don Lewis wrote: On 25 Sep, Matt Smith wrote: On Sep 24 21:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! > > Try dropping the attached patch in net/mediatomb/files. I submitted it > > in March, in PR198436: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198436 > > Eh, now with an ac

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

2015-09-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Sep, Matt Smith wrote: > On Sep 24 21:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>Hi! >> >>> > > Try dropping the attached patch in net/mediatomb/files. I submitted it >>> > > in March, in PR198436: >>> > > >>> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198436 >>> > >>> > Eh, now with an actual patc

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

2015-09-25 Thread Matt Smith
On Sep 25 09:18, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198436 This seems to create a run time dependency on GCC. Should it not just be a build time dependency which allows you to uninstall GCC afterwards? Maybe, I have not looked into that. Can you

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

2015-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198436 > This seems to create a run time dependency on GCC. Should it not just be > a build time dependency which allows you to uninstall GCC afterwards? Maybe, I have not looked into that. Can you suggest a patch ? -- p...@opsec.