On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:19:54PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10
> and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only
> one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used.
>
This is default behaviour for other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current
> running version.
I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: someone
(currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder con
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Jamie Landeg-Jones
wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume
> that
> > I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am
> > probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current po
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume that
> I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am
> probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE
> system, but there are a couple of ports that I ne
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10
> and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only
> one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used.
>
> Traditionally, we create all supported INDEX-
Hi,
Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10
and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only
one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used.
Traditionally, we create all supported INDEX-* files by default, but the
only users who would benefit fro
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:33:28PM +0200, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> Hi K.,
>
> On 2015-08-06 12:33 -0700, "K. Macy" wrote:
> >Is this still happening?
>
> Still crashes:
>
> Thu Aug 6 23:22:05 CEST 2015
>
> FreeBSD blaviken.slowicza.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #50 r286370:
> Thu Aug 6
Hi K.,
On 2015-08-06 12:33 -0700, "K. Macy" wrote:
>Is this still happening?
Still crashes:
Thu Aug 6 23:22:05 CEST 2015
FreeBSD blaviken.slowicza.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #50 r286370:
Thu Aug 6 19:55:29 CEST 2015
r...@blaviken.slowicza.org:/usr/obj/hdd/src/sys/GENERIC am
Is this still happening?
On Jul 15, 2015 1:41 PM, "Pawel Pekala" wrote:
> Hi John-Mark,
>
> On 2015-07-15 11:05 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >Please repost the entire panic message, and the back trace w/o X
> >running... Also, if you could share the core and kernel w/ me (you can
> >email m
Hi!
As part of the "opaque ifnet project" [1], all 802.11 (WiFi) drivers
undergo change of not being an interface anymore. Historically in FreeBSD
802.11 stack, 802.11 devices called if_attach() and created an interface.
Later this was generalized and real functioning interface is created by
n
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 07:49:56AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
T> > I ended with doing the aforementioned 2 changes as one.
T>
T> > The diff is living here:
T>
T> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2655
T>
T> > It spans the net80211 layer and converts (almost) all 802.11 drivers
T> > to new KPI. No
> I ended with doing the aforementioned 2 changes as one.
> The diff is living here:
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2655
> It spans the net80211 layer and converts (almost) all 802.11 drivers
> to new KPI. Now it also converts if_ndis, and this is the change I
> am asking you to test.
> Unlike
12 matches
Mail list logo
