Hi,
On 19 August 2014 12:40, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> On 19.08.2014 21:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hey, this is cool!
>>
>> So hm, why are you still doing any reading? Don't you now have all the
>> information you need to write out the font and cursor information for
>> each given set of 8
On 08/19/14 12:02, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 19.08.2014 19:46, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/19/14 09:28, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
o vt_vga introduces a new callback, vd_bitblt_text_t, which takes
as argument the text buffer, the dirty area, the font and the
On 19.08.2014 21:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hey, this is cool!
>
> So hm, why are you still doing any reading? Don't you now have all the
> information you need to write out the font and cursor information for
> each given set of 8 pixels?
I read a lot about VGA in the past days but I'm new to thi
Hey, this is cool!
So hm, why are you still doing any reading? Don't you now have all the
information you need to write out the font and cursor information for
each given set of 8 pixels?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On 19.08.2014 19:46, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 08/19/14 09:28, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
>> o vt_vga introduces a new callback, vd_bitblt_text_t, which takes
>> as argument the text buffer, the dirty area, the font and the
>> cursor (position, map, colors).
>
> Why is th
On 08/19/14 09:28, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 19.08.2014 10:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 16.08.2014 01:51, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
It also has bad effects on boot time. My desktop takes something like 3
times as long to boot after r269471. If it can't be fixed quickly, it
needs to
On 19.08.2014 10:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> On 16.08.2014 01:51, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> It also has bad effects on boot time. My desktop takes something like 3
>> times as long to boot after r269471. If it can't be fixed quickly, it
>> needs to be reverted.
>
> Just a quick note: I'm w
On 8/18/2014 3:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:38:25PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 2014-08-13 10:38, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2014 4:28 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I have a system running CURRENT at r266925 from May 31.
While
On 8/19/2014 8:53 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2014-08-19 08:42, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> On 08/18/2014 16:45, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> The first thing that I'd like to see is (in kgdb):
>>>
>>> set $td=(struct thread)0xf8002abeb000
>>> tid $td->td_tid
>>> bt
>>>
>>> That will show us the backtr
Bezüglich Eric van Gyzen's Nachricht vom 19.08.2014 15:39 (localtime):
> On 08/19/2014 09:14, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> …
>>> At least that's what we found in the freebsd.org cluster. nss-pam-ldapd
>>> was
>>> two or three orders of magnitude more usable and got rid of nscd in the
>>> pro
On 2014-08-19 08:42, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 08/18/2014 16:45, Ryan Stone wrote:
The first thing that I'd like to see is (in kgdb):
set $td=(struct thread)0xf8002abeb000
tid $td->td_tid
bt
That will show us the backtrace of the thread that was blocked for so
long.
Make that:
set $td=(
On 08/18/2014 16:45, Ryan Stone wrote:
> The first thing that I'd like to see is (in kgdb):
>
> set $td=(struct thread)0xf8002abeb000
> tid $td->td_tid
> bt
>
> That will show us the backtrace of the thread that was blocked for so long.
Make that:
set $td=(struct thread *)0xf8002abeb000
t
On 08/19/2014 09:14, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bezüglich Peter Wemm's Nachricht vom 17.08.2014 19:18 (localtime):
>> On Sunday 17 August 2014 15:22:02 O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:09:10 +
>>>
>>> "Eggert, Lars" schrieb:
Nobody using nscd? Really?
>>> I can only speak
On 2014-8-19, at 13:54, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>
> I know that this a bit late but have you ever considered Hesiod? it uses
> DNS/txt.
> we have been using it since the days when BSDi had no NIS support and haven’t
> seen a ypserver not responding since :-)
I don't control the master NIS infrast
On 2014-8-18, at 20:23, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Why not run a local slave on your server?
I am trying to get one set up. It requires a change request to our
organization's IT, which is, ahem, not always lightning fast.
Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMai
Bezüglich Peter Wemm's Nachricht vom 17.08.2014 19:18 (localtime):
> On Sunday 17 August 2014 15:22:02 O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Am Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:09:10 +
>>
>> "Eggert, Lars" schrieb:
>>> Nobody using nscd? Really?
>> I can only speak for myself and I stopped using nscd since the support is
On Aug 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-8-17, at 18:10, Adam McDougall wrote:
>> We were using +: type entries in the local password and group
>> tables and I believe we used an unmodified /etc/nsswitch.conf (excluding
>> cache lines while testing nscd):
>
On 16.08.2014 01:51, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> It also has bad effects on boot time. My desktop takes something like 3
> times as long to boot after r269471. If it can't be fixed quickly, it
> needs to be reverted.
Just a quick note: I'm working on an update to vt_vga. The current patch
already fi
18 matches
Mail list logo
