> hm, I have similar experience with 10-stable see
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-July/259067.html
Thankfully, my boot time is not so severe. I have no ideas to help however.
* preventing coredump files:
setting in ~/.cshrc below does not work. What is the correct syn
Hi,
There has been little comment w.r.t. the NFSv4.1
server code I dropped into head a month ago.
It changes the internal interfaces between the
NFS related kernel modules, but I do not believe
that these would be considered KPIs.
I`d like to MFC it to stable10 for 10.1.
Does anyone have a stro
Hi,
On July 10, at the Bay Area FreeBSD Users Group ( http://bafug.org ),
Adrian Chadd gave a very nice talk:
"Upcoming RSS enhancements to the FreeBSD Network Stack"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CvIztTz-RQ
Thanks to Adrian for doing the work and giving the talk!
Thanks to Cao Pham for r
Hi,
Thanks to Cao Pham at iXsystems, video for this
presentation has been posted online:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRLV_SZo6Sw
--
Craig
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On July 10, 2014, in Mountain View, California, I will be giving a brief
> tech talk
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała <
> tr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> At the link below you will find a patch that adds the new automounter.
>> The patch is against yesterdays 11.0-CURRENT.
>>
>> http://people.freebs
Jan,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
> On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
> >At the console, depressing and holding a key does not lead to auto-repeat.
> >
> >At the console, sometimes a key only appears on the terminal after another
> >key is pressed.
>
> M
Hi,
On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
At the console, depressing and holding a key does not lead to auto-repeat.
At the console, sometimes a key only appears on the terminal after another
key is pressed.
Maybe this is a problem caused by a misdetected clock source? I've had
this prob
Hi,
Previously I ran CURRENT from some time in April without any problems.
Symptoms:
Consistently high LA (2.6 to 8.0) with all CPUs idle.
At the console, depressing and holding a key does not lead to auto-repeat.
At the console, sometimes a key only appears on the terminal after another
key i
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:02:22PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
D> Without diminishing your efforts so far, what do you think about
D> pitching all efforts into IPFW to combine effort and reduce overhead of
D> maintaining separate firewalls in the core? Is there an advantage to
D> having our own pf?
I
On 07/29/14 20:35, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Mike. wrote:
M> |> imho, the root problem here is that an effort to implement a
M> single
M> |> feature improvement (multi-threading) has caused the FreeBSD
M> version
M> |> of pf to apparently reach a near-unmainta
On 30/07/2014 2:54 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> ...
> I would hope that is not the case. While NAT66 is "well known" and has been
> a topic of discussion for years, NPT66 is relatively new. It does share
> many concepts with NAT66 (and, most likely implementations also share
> code), but does not req
Hi,
I am still seeing this with arm/power/sparc/mips. Can somene please fix it?
===> usr.bin/m4/tests (all)
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/scratch/tmp/bz/head.svn/usr.bin/m4/misc.c: In function 'm4errx':
/scratch/tmp/bz/head.svn/usr.bin/m4/misc.c:268: warning: declaration of 'eval'
sh
On 7/29/2014 3:18 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Darren,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:36:06PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
D> Never mistake silence for consent.
D>
D> The vast majority of people don't know pf is outdated and broken on
D> FreeBSD because they don't know what they're missing and likely
13 matches
Mail list logo
