Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:38:16PM +0900, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:23:32PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I just had a chance to plug the Ethernet cable directly into my laptop's > > bge(4) port, and it immediately negotiated at 1000baseT; but with the > > switch, > >

Re: ports broken in current

On Thu, 8 May 2014 09:04-0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On May 7, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > > > I have just updated my 11-CURRENT tinderbox machine and found an issue > > that breaks ports building. > > > > make: "/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk" line 15: Could not find bsd.own.mk > > Inst

Re: WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

On 2014-05-09 07:32, Warner Losh wrote: > > On May 8, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) > wrote: > >> On 2014-05-09 02:54, Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>> On May 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Guy Yur wrote: >>> Hi, After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split WITHOUT_NIS in src.

Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:23:32PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:14:11AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:57:03PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > Hmm, Does the switch support EEE feature? If yes, would you try > > > disabling it? > > >

Re: WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

On May 8, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote: > On 2014-05-09 02:54, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On May 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Guy Yur wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split >>> WITHOUT_NIS in src.conf doesn't work. >> >> It should still work… At lea

Re: WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

On 2014-05-09 02:54, Warner Losh wrote: > > On May 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Guy Yur wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split >> WITHOUT_NIS in src.conf doesn't work. > > It should still work… At least that’s the intention... > >> src.conf is included in src.opts.mk after bsd

Re: [rfc] bind per-cpu timeout threads to each CPU

Hi, I'd like to revisit this now. I'd like to commit this stuff as-is and then take some time to revisit the catch-all softclock from cpu0 swi. It's more complicated than it needs to be as it just assumes timeout_cpu == cpuid of cpu 0. So there's no easy way to slide in a new catch-all softclock.

Re: WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

On 2014-05-09 02:54, Warner Losh wrote: > > On May 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Guy Yur wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split >> WITHOUT_NIS in src.conf doesn't work. > > It should still work… At least that’s the intention... > >> src.conf is included in src.opts.mk after bsd

Re: WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

On May 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Guy Yur wrote: > Hi, > > After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split > WITHOUT_NIS in src.conf doesn't work. It should still work… At least that’s the intention... > src.conf is included in src.opts.mk after bsd.own.mk > which includes bsd.opts.mk. Yea, that’s a pro

WITHOUT_NIS after bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split

Hi, After the bsd.opts.mk / src.opts.mk split WITHOUT_NIS in src.conf doesn't work. src.conf is included in src.opts.mk after bsd.own.mk which includes bsd.opts.mk. Should bsd.opts.mk options overrides now be set in make.conf instead of src.conf? Was on r265455, updated to r265715 and rebuilt w

Re: /usr/src: svn status: svn: E200030: sqlite[S1]: near "1": syntax error

Am Thu, 08 May 2014 16:38:41 -0400 Lowell Gilbert schrieb: > "O. Hartmann" writes: > > > I get this weird error in /usr/src with the port devel/subversion: > > > > root@thor: [ports] svn st > > svn: E200030: sqlite[S1]: near "1": syntax error > > > > Using /bin/svn everything is clear. > > > >

Re: /usr/src: svn status: svn: E200030: sqlite[S1]: near "1": syntax error

"O. Hartmann" writes: > I get this weird error in /usr/src with the port devel/subversion: > > root@thor: [ports] svn st > svn: E200030: sqlite[S1]: near "1": syntax error > > Using /bin/svn everything is clear. > > What happened here? > > OS is > > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r265433: Tue May 6 13

Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:14:11AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:57:03PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > Hmm, Does the switch support EEE feature? If yes, would you try > > disabling it? > > I do not think it [1] does; plus I cannot do much about this switch, as I'm

Re: Bumps in the build...

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:12:31AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Greetings, > > Please accept my apologies for the the bumps in the build in > recent days. I knew my changes were large, and tried to test them > as best I could before the commit. However, there are too many > scenarios my testing did

Bumps in the build...

Greetings, Please accept my apologies for the the bumps in the build in recent days. I knew my changes were large, and tried to test them as best I could before the commit. However, there are too many scenarios my testing didn’t hit (including some in hind sight that were obvious holes in my te

Re: ports broken in current

On May 7, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > I have just updated my 11-CURRENT tinderbox machine and found an issue > that breaks ports building. > > make: "/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk" line 15: Could not find bsd.own.mk Install again. This was fixed last night. You can fix it just by updat

Re: Questions and *little* bugs in new vt(9)

On 8 May 2014 04:16, David Demelier wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm currently trying vt(9) on a CURRENT kernel (only the kernel not the > base). I have very small bugs, not really serious. I'm currently using the > radeon KMS driver. > > * When I switch from a tty to X I can see the mouse appearing but

Re: New and exciting panic, possibly re(4)

On 07.05.2014 23:24, Sean Bruno wrote: While screwing around with comcast, I can trivially get this panic out of my desktop machine, and am very confused. It seems to happen on link change up/down events. I'm running 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #5 r265280M. I don't have any direct eviden

Re: Fresh-install from -current snapshot: Boot loader too large

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:24:01AM +0200 I heard the voice of Jeremie Le Hen, and lo! it spake thus: > > On the first boot I get the following error message: > Boot loader too large As I recall, this comes from the freebsd-boot partition being too big, where "too big" is some unround number l

Fresh-install from -current snapshot: Boot loader too large

Hi, I installed FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-i386-20140428-r265054-disc1.iso to a VirtualBox i386 VM. I did the most straightforward install you can possibly do (hit enter repeatedly, except for hostname and password). On the first boot I get the following error message: Boot loader too large Note

Questions and *little* bugs in new vt(9)

Hi there, I'm currently trying vt(9) on a CURRENT kernel (only the kernel not the base). I have very small bugs, not really serious. I'm currently using the radeon KMS driver. * When I switch from a tty to X I can see the mouse appearing but the tty is still displayed until I move the mouse.