Re: sem_wait(3) is not always a cancellation point

2014-03-12 Thread David Xu
On 2014/03/13 04:33, Eric van Gyzen wrote: -current: From my understand of POSIX, sem_wait(3) should always be a cancellation point. However, when the semaphore's count is positive and the caller successfully decrements the count, sem_wait(3) does not call _pthread_testcancel(), so it's not a

vm_map.h

2014-03-12 Thread Bruno Lauzé
The two defines in vm/vm_map.h  #define min_offset   header.start    /* (c) */ #define max_offset   header.end      /* (c) */ are really getting in the way because those words are most likely to be used downstream. I would suggest renaming those defines to: #define vm_min_offset   header.star

sem_wait(3) is not always a cancellation point

2014-03-12 Thread Eric van Gyzen
-current: >From my understand of POSIX, sem_wait(3) should always be a cancellation point. However, when the semaphore's count is positive and the caller successfully decrements the count, sem_wait(3) does not call _pthread_testcancel(), so it's not a cancellation point. See this totally contriv

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2014-03-12 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2014-03-12 17:29:55 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2014-03-12 17:29:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2014

Re: panic: lockmgr still held [tmpfs] [vm_map_remove()->vdropl()] (r262186: Thu Feb 20)

2014-03-12 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 3/5/2014 1:50 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 02:21:04PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:07:23 am Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:41:24AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 04/03/2014 18:45 John Baldwin said the foll

Re: reproducible panic every day at 03:02, probably triggered by daily periodic scipts - help

2014-03-12 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>From b...@0x20.net Thu Mar 6 22:02:56 2014 > >On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:59:14AM -0800, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> In my initial PR (sparc64 r261798), >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187080 >> >> I said that rsync was triggering this panic. >> While true, I now see that ther

Re: MacPro 2009 again

2014-03-12 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 03/12/14 09:25, Nicolas Kozic wrote: Hello all, I come back on FreeBSD. I tried for a couple of months macports, fink on macosx on Mavericks version but it is not the same. On Mavericks we can have X via XQuartz but I miss some softwares and X from FreeBSD is different. So my actual solutio

MacPro 2009 again

2014-03-12 Thread Nicolas Kozic
Hello all, I come back on FreeBSD. I tried for a couple of months macports, fink on macosx on Mavericks version but it is not the same. On Mavericks we can have X via XQuartz but I miss some softwares and X from FreeBSD is different. So my actual solution is: Use one system with my needs and boo