On 12/12/13 08:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi Kohji,
Did you check using a USB analyzer what the difference is when setting
the CHAIN bit and not setting the chain bit?
I would guess that if you set the CHAIN-bit in this case, no ZLP will be
sent, becau
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:15:02 +0100
> On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> From: Hans Petter Selasky
>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
>>> On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you
On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, I'm still not a fan of the EAGAIN approach. I'd rather have a method
> in bus_if.m to suspend or resume a single device and to track that a device
> is suspended or resumed via a device_t flag or some such. (I think I had
> suggested this
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
> On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>
>> Hi HPS,
>>
>> All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
>> But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
>> bit. Could you check linux codes?
>>
>>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:21:13 am Justin Hibbits wrote:
>> I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to
>> add suspend/resume as well as CPU speed change for certain PowerPC
>> machines, about a year since I c
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:21:13 am Justin Hibbits wrote:
> I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to
> add suspend/resume as well as CPU speed change for certain PowerPC
> machines, about a year since I created the branch, and now it's stable
> enough that I want
This looks like it fixes my -CURRENT crash..
Thanks GNN/JHB
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:18:10PM +, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> Author: gnn
> Date: Wed Dec 11 17:18:10 2013
> New Revision: 259221
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259221
>
> Log:
> Fix a panic when booting wi
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you check linux codes?
Regards,
Kohji Okuno
Hi Kohji,
I went through the Linux codes a bit, and I see t
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/11/13, 8:24 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Rick Macklem
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just tried to MFC into stable/10 and it worked, but with
>>> a lot of mergeinfo. I know diddly about svn, so is th
On 12/11/13, 8:24 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to MFC into stable/10 and it worked, but with
a lot of mergeinfo. I know diddly about svn, so is this ok?
Starting with stable/10 and later you must merge into the *root*, not into s
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:48:54PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:38:53 +0100
> Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:21:13PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> > > I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now
> > > to add suspend/resume as
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:50:50 +0100
> On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
>
> Could
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:44:37 +0100
> On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>> On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB F
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt
> On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
>>
>> Could you refer to
>> ``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
>> in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
>>
>> The following is an excerpt about the CHAI
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit (
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit (CH). Set to ‘1’ by software to associate
19 matches
Mail list logo
