On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Wilkinson, Alex
wrote:
> 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860
>
> KERNCONF:
>
> options VIMAGE
>
> makeoptions DEBUG=-g
>
> device pf
> device pflog
> device pfsync
> device carp
>
>
How badly do you need VIMAGE in
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:19:49AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
W> 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860
W>
W> KERNCONF:
W>
W> include GENERIC
W>
W> options DDB
W> options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
W>
W> options ROUTETABLES=6
W> options VIMAGE
W>
W>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:19:49AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
W> 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860
W>
W> KERNCONF:
W>
W> include GENERIC
W>
W> options DDB
W> options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
W>
W> options ROUTETABLES=6
W> options VIMAGE
W>
W>
Hi,
Sorry for cross posting but this concerns both lists.
Over the last month or so I've been upgrading my prod infrastructure from 9
to 10. It's mostly complete except for a number of issues. One issue, just
solved today (circumvented is a better word), is exmh crashing 10.0 on
amd64 while on
10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860
KERNCONF:
include GENERIC
options DDB
options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
options ROUTETABLES=6
options VIMAGE
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
device pf
device pflog
On 12/04/2013 00:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>> On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> The tests were successfu
from Glen Barber (excerpt):
> Changes between -BETA3 and -BETA4 include:
- Add preliminary support for RTL8106E, RTL8168G, RTL8168GU,
RTL8411B, and RTL8168EP.
- Enable fingerprint checking in pkg(8) for FreeBSD-provided binary
packages.
- Remove the WITH_LIBICONV_COMPAT bu
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The tests were successful:
https://redports.org/buildarchive/2013120
On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>> On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Trying to
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> >>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Ha
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
>>> anything new? Having build the port and all dependenci
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
>>> anything new? Having build the port and al
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:54:08PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> Dear Gleb,
V> Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on "trying to mount
root from ssdzfs" (which is my zfs root).
V> Vladimir,
You can run the kernel that boots, but update only sys/netpfil/pf
directory to
Dear Gleb,
Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on "trying to mount
root from ssdzfs" (which is my zfs root).
Vladimir,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph
tunnel
The fourth BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
This is expected to be the final BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE cycle.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO ima
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> Dear Gleb,
V> Is kernel rebuilding enuff ?
Should be enough wrt pf(4), no API or ABI changes in it.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
Dear Gleb,
Is kernel rebuilding enuff ?
Vladimir,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph
tunnel with Real_IP_B.
V> I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tun
Vladimir,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph
tunnel with Real_IP_B.
V> I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel,
if
V> it came via tunnel:
V>
V> pas
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph
tunnel with Real_IP_B.
I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if
it came via tunnel:
pass in quick on $tunnel_if reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \
proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B por
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph
tunnel with Real_IP_B. I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the
traffic back via tunnel, if it came via tunnel: pass in quick on $tunnel_if
reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \ proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B port 4
20 matches
Mail list logo
