Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 06:48:11 +0100 Matthias Petermann wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello James, > > Am 16.11.2013 05:37, schrieb James R. Van Artsdalen: > > Asus Z9PA-U8 motherboard, 256GB of RAM, 2.4 GHz Xeon E5-2695 v2, > > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r258092 > > > >

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello James, Am 16.11.2013 05:37, schrieb James R. Van Artsdalen: > Asus Z9PA-U8 motherboard, 256GB of RAM, 2.4 GHz Xeon E5-2695 v2, > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r258092 > > There is a two minute pause when booting, after the loader's SMAP > display and t

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

On 2013-11-15 23:37, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > Asus Z9PA-U8 motherboard, 256GB of RAM, 2.4 GHz Xeon E5-2695 v2, FreeBSD > 11.0-CURRENT r258092 > > There is a two minute pause when booting, after the loader's SMAP > display and the initial kernel output, > > Does anyone know what's going on he

Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

Asus Z9PA-U8 motherboard, 256GB of RAM, 2.4 GHz Xeon E5-2695 v2, FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r258092 There is a two minute pause when booting, after the loader's SMAP display and the initial kernel output, Does anyone know what's going on here? Even that much RAM shouldn't take that much time to clear.

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-11-15 17:40:10 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 17:40:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-11-15 17:26:46 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 17:26:46 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-11-15 17:14:26 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 17:14:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2013-11-15 16:47:50 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 16:47:50 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

TB --- 2013-11-15 17:05:30 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 17:05:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2013-11-15 16:56:42 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-15 16:56:42 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: pkg install on CURRENT ?

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:29:10 -0500 > Outback Dingo wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:13:58PM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > anyway to resolve this ??? id

Re: Defaults in 10.0 ZFS through bsdinstall

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 3:23, Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 14.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Teske, Devin: >> > On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >> >> We don't even do installs on UFS with atime disabled by default in fstab >> >> so w

Re: Defaults in 10.0 ZFS through bsdinstall

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 3:23, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 14.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Teske, Devin: > > On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> We don't even do installs on UFS with atime disabled by default in fstab > >> so why should we so suddenly change course for ZFS? > >> > > > >

Re: pkg install on CURRENT ?

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:29:10 -0500 Outback Dingo wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:13:58PM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > anyway to resolve this ??? id like to pkg install a few things or > > > is my only option ports > > >

Re: pkg install on CURRENT ?

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:13:58PM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > > anyway to resolve this ??? id like to pkg install a few things or is my > > only option ports > > > > Checking integrity... done > > [1/16] Installing expat-2.0.1_2...pkg

Re: Defaults in 10.0 ZFS through bsdinstall

Am 14.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Teske, Devin: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >> We don't even do installs on UFS with atime disabled by default in fstab >> so why should we so suddenly change course for ZFS? >> > > You've made a good point. There is major difference between UFS a

Re: Defaults in 10.0 ZFS through bsdinstall

Am 15.11.2013 01:00, schrieb Mark Felder: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 15:04, Teske, Devin wrote: >> Sounds like a vote for enabling it where-needed by-default (e.g., /var as a >> whole >> or more selectively, /var/mail) > > I'd be OK with FreeBSD taking a stance and moving to noatime by default but >

Re: pkg install on CURRENT ?

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:13:58PM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > anyway to resolve this ??? id like to pkg install a few things or is my > only option ports > > Checking integrity... done > [1/16] Installing expat-2.0.1_2...pkg: wrong architecture: > freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64