Re: iwn(4) hangs after r257133

Oh, and you need to print out the tx->rate field using "0x%04x", rather than %d. The completion value is in hex. -adrian On 9 November 2013 22:18, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Sure, flip on 'wlandebug +rate' (assuming you compiled with IEEE80211_DEBUG) > > > -a > > On 9 November 2013 21:08, Brandon Go

Re: iwn(4) hangs after r257133

Sure, flip on 'wlandebug +rate' (assuming you compiled with IEEE80211_DEBUG) -a On 9 November 2013 21:08, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On 9 November 2013 18:29, Brandon Gooch wrote: >>> Turns out that not enabling MRR causes my Intel

Re: iwn(4) hangs after r257133

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > On 9 November 2013 18:29, Brandon Gooch wrote: >> Turns out that not enabling MRR causes my Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link >> 5300 to hang after only a few moments of use. > > That's .. odd. Ok. > >> For now, I've just reverted only those

Re: iwn(4) hangs after r257133

Hi! On 9 November 2013 18:29, Brandon Gooch wrote: > Turns out that not enabling MRR causes my Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link > 5300 to hang after only a few moments of use. That's .. odd. Ok. > For now, I've just reverted only those aspects of r257133, enabling > MRR and keeping the rate index loo

iwn(4) hangs after r257133

Turns out that not enabling MRR causes my Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300 to hang after only a few moments of use. For now, I've just reverted only those aspects of r257133, enabling MRR and keeping the rate index lookup, which seems to do something on my hardware at least (I assume it's not the r

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 2013-11-09 21:13, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2013 17:58, Allan Jude wrote: > >> Well, if the rc.conf config is specific to the daemon being installed by >> the package, then the existing /etc/rc.conf.d/ system works fine, it >> just falls down a little on xorg configuring hald, unless

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 9 November 2013 17:58, Allan Jude wrote: > Well, if the rc.conf config is specific to the daemon being installed by > the package, then the existing /etc/rc.conf.d/ system works fine, it > just falls down a little on xorg configuring hald, unless you just make > the xorg package create /etc/rc

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 2013-11-09 20:55, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2013 17:40, Allan Jude wrote: >> On 2013-11-09 20:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> On 9 November 2013 16:28, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Well, what about making these extra directories optional then? packages install the crontab entries

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 9 November 2013 17:40, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-11-09 20:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 9 November 2013 16:28, Allan Jude wrote: >> >>> Well, what about making these extra directories optional then? >>> >>> packages install the crontab entries, but crond ignores them unless you add: >>> >>>

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 2013-11-09 20:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2013 16:28, Allan Jude wrote: > >> Well, what about making these extra directories optional then? >> >> packages install the crontab entries, but crond ignores them unless you add: >> >> cron_flags="--scandir /etc/cron.d --scandir /usr/local

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 9 November 2013 16:28, Allan Jude wrote: > Well, what about making these extra directories optional then? > > packages install the crontab entries, but crond ignores them unless you add: > > cron_flags="--scandir /etc/cron.d --scandir /usr/local/etc/cron.d" > > or something to that effect > >

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 2013-11-09 19:18, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2013 16:05, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> On 10 Nov 2013, at 24:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> 2) Should ports / packages populate these cron.d directories? >>> >>> This is a much more interesting question. Effectively its asking >>>

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 10 Nov 2013, at 10:48, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> ie either the file is named such that it is ignored by cron (preferable IMO) >> or the entries in them are commented out. > > I want the opposite. > > I'm kinda fed up installing packages that don't enable themselves. > > 'pkg install xorg' is

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 9 November 2013 16:05, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2013, at 24:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> 2) Should ports / packages populate these cron.d directories? >> >> This is a much more interesting question. Effectively its asking >> if a port / package should provide some

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 10 Nov 2013, at 24:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > 2) Should ports / packages populate these cron.d directories? > > This is a much more interesting question. Effectively its asking > if a port / package should provide some level of automatic > configuration -- a thing tha

Re : newcons comming

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:45:32 +0200 dt71 at gmx.com wrote: > Suppose that Newcons gets in quickly. I use a Radeon 9600 card. Will > I see something useful on my screen (with KMS and the new Xorg and > things like that), or will my screen be black? Yup, you will get normal virtual terminal, but a

WEAK_REFERENCE?

Hi all, anyone interested in this patch to remove the WEAK_ALIAS and introduce the WEAK_REFERENCE? http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref.amd64.diff I have this running since months on amd64 and I have no issues with. I remember having had a communication with bde@ that he is in favour in

Re: freebsd perf testing

Hi Julian, Den 08/11/2013 kl. 03.02 skrev Julian Elischer : > Some time ago someone showed some freebsd performance graphs graphed against > time. > He had them up on a website that was updated each day or so. > > I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. > He indicated that he was

Re: freebsd perf testing

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 6:37 AM, wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:28:02PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 11/8/13, 1:54 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Julian Elischer > > >wrote: >> > >> > Some time ago someone showed so

Re: freebsd perf testing

Hi Julian, Den 08/11/2013 kl. 03.02 skrev Julian Elischer : > Some time ago someone showed some freebsd performance graphs graphed against > time. > He had them up on a website that was updated each day or so. > > I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. > He indicated that he was

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 08/11/2013 04:51, Allan Jude wrote: > My use case is puppet etc, not ports/packages, so I'll leave the policy > about packages up to portsmgr@, I just want a less sloppy way to manage > crontabs with my orchestration system (and feature parity with Linux) There's two questions here: 1) Shou

Re: freebsd perf testing

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:28:02PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 11/8/13, 1:54 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Julian Elischer > >wrote: > > > > Some time ago someone showed some freebsd performance graphs > > graphed ag

Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support

On 07/11/13 19:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On 28/10/13 14:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The Xen community is working on a new virtualization mode (or maybe I >> should say an extension of HVM) to be able to run PV guests inside HVM >> containers without requiring a device-model (Qem