Re: compilation

2013-07-27 Thread gahn
thank freddie! From: Freddie Cash To: gahn Cc: FreeBSD-Current Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 9:23 PM Subject: Re: compilation umass requires SCSI support. Bert you removed scbus, da, and similar. On 2013-07-27 6:00 PM, "gahn" wrote: hi all: > >need y

Re: compilation

2013-07-27 Thread Freddie Cash
umass requires SCSI support. Bert you removed scbus, da, and similar. On 2013-07-27 6:00 PM, "gahn" wrote: > hi all: > > need your experts' opinions, i tried to compile customized kernel for 8.3 > but failed miserably: > > linking kernel.debug > dcons_crom.o(.text+0x388): In function `dcons_crom_

compilation

2013-07-27 Thread gahn
hi all: need your experts' opinions, i tried to compile customized kernel for 8.3 but failed miserably: linking kernel.debug dcons_crom.o(.text+0x388): In function `dcons_crom_post_busreset': /usr/src/sys/dev/dcons/dcons_crom.c:145: undefined reference to `crom_add_chunk' dcons_crom.o(.text+0x3a

GENERIC: options KDB_TRACE

2013-07-27 Thread Andriy Gapon
What is the reason to have the following option commented out in GENERIC in head: #optionsKDB_TRACE ? Wouldn't it be more helpful to have it enabled? -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

Re: NMI on shutdown

2013-07-27 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 13:06 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hi, > > The following log messages are displayed on a box where I am testing > stable/9. It occurs only when trying to shutdown the box: > > | Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done > | Waiting (max 60 second

Re: [Heads up] BSD-licensed patch becoming the default RSN.

2013-07-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
OK; On further revision ... On 26.07.2013 20:01, Jan Beich wrote: bsdpatch doesn't list files of the failed hunks with -C and -s option. This may be less convenient if you edit a patch directly rather than regen it after polluting the tree. $ patch -CEfsp0 -i /path/to/varsym.diff 1 out of 1 hun

Re: [Heads up] BSD-licensed patch becoming the default RSN.

2013-07-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 26.07.2013 23:11, Jan Beich wrote: Pedro Giffuni writes: Now, just some food for thought, but if you are unsure your patch applies cleanly, why would you choose to use the -s (silent) option? Because by default patch(1) is overly verbose. At first, I'm only interested if a patch applies cle