On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM, wen heping wrote:
> I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month.
There were some intermittent issues but *recent* stable/9 should build
fine on *recent* head. If not, please report the errors and have sjg@
look at them.
Thanks,
Hiren
>
> we
I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month.
wen
2013/7/16 Brooks Davis
> After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last
> week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new
> current I'd updated to fixed it.
>
> -- Brooks
>
>
TB --- 2013-07-15 21:10:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-15 21:10:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Chris Torek wrote:
> In src/sys/amd64/include/vmparam.h is this handy map:
>
> * 0x - 0x7fff user map
> * 0x8000 - 0x7fff does not exist (hole)
> * 0x8000 - 0x804020100fff recursive page
TB --- 2013-07-15 18:03:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-15 18:03:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last
week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new
current I'd updated to fixed it.
-- Brooks
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:07:04PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see exactly the same error on pointyh
TB --- 2013-07-15 14:13:41 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-15 14:13:41 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>> On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being
>>> built
>>> and install
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:48:18 -0500, Teske, Devin
wrote:
> I think Mark was saying that libfetch doesn't yet support http proxy.
Now that I've googled, I was referring to this PR
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180253
I thought it was complete missing functionality, not just that bug.
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:51:00PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away
>>> for HEAD pkg access, I'll need t
TB --- 2013-07-15 15:46:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-15 15:46:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:52:26PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 14 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Teske, Devin wrote:
Simple, really.
Let's take RPM for example. The RPM package format has been porte
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 07:29:50AM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>>
>>> Or you
>>> can maintain the old cruft for your business -- just don't expect
>>> anyone else to use it, or even want to.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I have no intention of making ol
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 8:44, RW wrote:
> >
> > Is that really correct? I would expect the deinstall to be done after
> > the build has completed successfully.
> >
>
> That might not be accurate with a current portmaster, but we used to
> hav
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:12:19AM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/07/2013 06:48, Teske, Devin wrote:
Question: Where can I learn more about the actual format of what's in
the new tarball
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 8:44, RW wrote:
>
> Is that really correct? I would expect the deinstall to be done after
> the build has completed successfully.
>
That might not be accurate with a current portmaster, but we used to
have that happen all too frequently. I just checked the plist and it ha
On 15 July 2013 18:01, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recent change:
> -
> # svn log ./sys/sys/sf_buf.h |less
>
> r253351 | ae | 2013-07-15 08:16:57 +0200 (Mon, 15 Jul 2013) | 6 lines
>
> Introduce new structure sfstat for
Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> > As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with
> > ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port
> > stops the daemon and my coworker upgrades with portmaster... t
TB --- 2013-07-15 10:40:20 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-15 10:40:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hi
Recent change:
-
# svn log ./sys/sys/sf_buf.h |less
r253351 | ae | 2013-07-15 08:16:57 +0200 (Mon, 15 Jul 2013) | 6 lines
Introduce new structure sfstat for collecting sendfile's statistics
and remove corresponding fi
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:46:03PM +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> > As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with
> > ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port
> > stops the daemon and
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with
> ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port
> stops the daemon and my coworker upgrades with portmaster... the daemon
> is off the entire
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, at 14:49, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> >
> > Strongly agreed -- and it's what other operating systems do, either
> > by policy or by convention.
> >
>
> As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never
>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, at 14:49, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> Strongly agreed -- and it's what other operating systems do, either by
> policy or by convention.
>
As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with
ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:16:37PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 02.07.2013 05:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >>
> >> Turns out the bug is quite funny ;)
> >>
> >> Try this:
> >> diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.
Hi.
On 15.07.2013 15:16, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>
> Guys, if this is working, why it's not commited to HEAD ? I'm still
> hitting this bug on r251990 and later ones.
>
I'm terribly sorry, I should read the revisions more carefully.
Eugene.
___
freebs
Hi.
On 02.07.2013 05:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>
>> Turns out the bug is quite funny ;)
>>
>> Try this:
>> diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c b/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c
>> index 5d8e814..7a4db04 100644
>> --- a/sys/kern/uipc_usr
2013/7/12 Alexander Motin :
> On 12.07.2013 23:54, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to setup XBMC on a -CURRENT box with an IvyBridge CPU and
>> GPU. While testing playback via mplayer on a LG TV over HDMI, I noticed
>> that sound is lagging video by about 100-200ms or so. When I switch to
>
On 7/15/13 10:12 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Teske, Devin
mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com>> wrote:
I assume that poudiere builds packages from ports.
Yes.
That's not how we build package repositories here
On 7/15/13 6:43 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
I assume that poudiere builds packages from ports.
Yes.
That's not how we build package repositories here (and would expect that
there are many more like us).
How do you build packages if
30 matches
Mail list logo
