In message <20130510213610.gg8...@home.opsec.eu>, you wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154
>>
>> It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the
>> issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described
>> within the PR remains a real
updated version
On 5/10/13, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> See the attached patch. This fixed the stdext features enumeration.
>
fix-stdext-enumeration-r249601.diff
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154
It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the
issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described
within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed
something that seems to be a perfectl
Hi!
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154
>
> It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the
> issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described
> within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed
> something that seems
Spil,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
S> There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
S> ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
S> there that I hit?
Yes, a regression is possible there. However, the issue seems t
Hi,
There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
there that I hit?
Just upgraded to r250404 but that does not help. Should I file a PR?
Kind regards,
Spil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Spil Oss
