TB --- 2013-04-05 23:00:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-05 23:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On 2013-04-02 1:52 AM, "Gleb Smirnoff" wrote:
>>
>> Freddie,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:10:03PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> F> Just curious if anyone has any scripts for managing fail-over of
> multiple
>> F> interfaces using the new
I am working on integrating a fix into illumos. FYI, the patch you
attached will not quite work, because you are using different tags to hold
and release the dataset (FTAG is a macro which has a
calling-function-specific value).
--matt
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Y
On 2013-04-05 14:07, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
I am working on integrating a fix into illumos. FYI, the patch you
attached will not quite work, because you are using different tags to
hold and release the dataset (FTAG is a macro which has a
calling-function-specific value).
--matt
Might this als
This is a patch against -CURRENT, so the receiving side in your case.
On 5.4.2013 18:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2013-04-05 11:29, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem.
>> We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos,
>> mayb
On 2013-04-05 11:29, Martin Matuska wrote:
You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem.
We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos,
maybe I will commit this preliminary (or final) fix to head.
Which side does this need to be on?
(sending? (since it's dmu
You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem.
We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos,
maybe I will commit this preliminary (or final) fix to head.
mm
On 5.4.2013 16:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2013-04-02 16:26, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> On 1. 4. 2013 2
On 2013-04-02 16:26, Martin Matuska wrote:
On 1. 4. 2013 22:33, Martin Matuska wrote:
This error seems to be limited to sending deduplicated streams. Does
sending without "-D" work ok? This might be a vendor error as well.
On 1.4.2013 20:05, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Re-Sending. Any ideas, guys/g
