2012/8/20 Bjorn Larsson
> Hi Andrey,
>
> We are installing freeBSD using ZFS as root filesystem using the GPT
> method as described on the freeBSD ZFS wiki. We are creating a GPT
> boot partition with the gptzfsboot program embedded and then a zroot
> partition with the freeBSD binaries. This wor
TB --- 2013-03-18 19:54:43 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-18 19:54:43 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2013-03-18 21:43, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> >> wrote:
> >>> Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Isaac (.ike) Levy writes:
>
> > Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in
> > to the freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context?
> > This will help keep the noise down.
>
> It will also keep do
On 2013-03-18 21:43, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>>> Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
>>> SLOW . FreeBSD A
>>> Computer B : Memor
Dear All ,
I tried the following on Nathan Whitehorn's suggestions :
I have disabled ~/.xinitrc , leaving X with its default window manager .
I have started Firefox . The same slow behavior !
The problem starts after STARTING X . The rest ( FluxBox , KDE , Gnome )
seems to be innocent .
If
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> > Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
> > SLOW . FreeBSD A
> > Computer B : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB ) : Working
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 15.03.2013 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Lars Eggert wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> this reminds me that I ran into an issue lately with the new NFS and
> >> locking for NFSv3 mounts on a client that ran -CURRENT and a server
> >> th
To all interested parties;
I have completed the final draft of the total rewrite of FreeBSD's
handbook Chapter 16 on Jails.
Before submitting my work for submission to the documentation group for
insertion in the handbook I am looking for critique of the work to find
errors in concept, wrong use
Isaac (.ike) Levy writes:
> Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in
> to the freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context?
> This will help keep the noise down.
It will also keep down the signal from people who use or are
interested in jails, but d
Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in to the
freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context? This will help keep
the noise down.
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> To all interested parties;
>
> I have completed the final draft of the total rewri
To all interested parties;
I have completed the final draft of the total rewrite of FreeBSD's
handbook Chapter 16 on Jails.
Before submitting my work for submission to the documentation group for
insertion in the handbook I am looking for critique of the work to find
errors in concept, wrong
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
> SLOW . FreeBSD A
> Computer B : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB ) : Working
> FAST . FreeBSD B
>
> Interchange memory chips :
>
> Computer A
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Beat Siegenthaler
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since some days i try to "make buildworld", but have some errors in
> sendmail.
> The make conf is not changed since years (in this case) . Adding
> NO_WERROR= in src.conf helps, but i think it is not the optimal solution?
>
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk" <
> m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com>
>
> You state there that "The main boards are the same" which indicates to me
>>> the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some oth
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
You state there that "The main boards are the same" which indicates to me
the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other
subtle
difference causing the problem.
To confirm you'll need to use the "exact same mac
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> **
> >> - Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> >>>
> >>> Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
> diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
> checking
> >>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message , "Steven
> Hartland" writes:
>
> >You state there that "The main boards are the same" which indicates to me
> >the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other
> subtle
> >difference causing the problem.
>
In message , "Steven
Hartland" writes:
>You state there that "The main boards are the same" which indicates to me
>the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other subtle
>difference causing the problem.
>
>To confirm you'll need to use the "exact same machine" for tests with
>> - Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>>>
>>> Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
checking
to see if the problem goes away?
>>>
>>> Please see links in my pr
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>
>> Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
>>> diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
>>> checking
>>> to see if the probl
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and checking
to see if the problem goes away?
Please see links in my previous mails .
All of these are
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <
> nwhiteh...@freebsd.org>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in
> slots
>
>
> On 03/18/13 07:18,
TB --- 2013-03-18 13:20:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-18 13:20:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-03-18 13:20:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-18 13:20:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Whitehorn"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In me
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp >wrote:
> >
> >> In message >> djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com>, Tom Evans writes:
> >>
> >>> You say this, have you actually measured/chec
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp >wrote:
> >
> >> In message >> djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com>, Tom Evans writes:
> >>
> >>> You say this, have you actually measured/chec
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message > djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com>, Tom Evans writes:
>>
>>> You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
>>> will interrogate your BIOS and tell us what i
On 15.03.2013 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
this reminds me that I ran into an issue lately with the new NFS and
locking for NFSv3 mounts on a client that ran -CURRENT and a server
that ran -STABLE.
When I ran "portmaster -a" on the client, which mounted /usr/ports and
/usr
On 16.03.2013 01:44, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 11:24:32 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.03.2013 14:46, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 9:40:56 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi Rick, all,
is there a plan to deci
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com>, Tom Evans writes:
>
> >You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
> >will interrogate your BIOS and tell us what it thinks is installed in
> >each RAM socket. It is not un
In message
, Tom Evans
writes:
>You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
>will interrogate your BIOS and tell us what it thinks is installed in
>each RAM socket. It is not uncommon for RAM to say one thing on the
>outside, and report something completely different to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>> > Dear All ,
>> >
>> > Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of
>> > memory
>
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> Dear All ,
>
> Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of memory
> chip placement on execution speed :
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031836.html
> Effect of Processor and
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> > Dear All ,
> >
> > Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of memory
> > chip placement on execution speed :
> >
> >
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermai
36 matches
Mail list logo
