Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Tim Kientzle wrote: On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la > > > > /.zfs/shares/' > > > > issued on

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la > > > > /.zfs/shares/' > > > > issued on

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/02/2013 18:36 Rick Macklem said the following: > > I can think of two possibilities: > > 1 - ZFS isn't setting VV_ROOT on the root vnode under some > > condition. > > or > > 2 - The vnode was left locked from some previous operation that > > happened > > to be done b

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically >> fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having >> trouble with gpart resize failing. >> >> Disk layout: >> MBR with two slices

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:06:41 -0800 Tim Kientzle wrote: > I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically > fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having > trouble with gpart resize failing. > > Disk layout: >MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2 >bsdlabel with one par

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically > fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having > trouble with gpart resize failing. > > Disk layout: >MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2 >bsdlabel with one partition

Re: r246057: buildworld fails with: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so: undefined reference to `std::bad_alloc::~bad_alloc()'

2013-02-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-01-29 11:06, O. Hartmann wrote: I receive this error since yesterday building world and it is still sticky on most recent sources (r246057) and I was wondering why the tinderboxes do not pick this up on the 10.0-CURRENT builds ... just for a notice for the development folks ... ... /usr

gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Tim Kientzle
I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout: MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2 bsdlabel with one partition mmcsd0s2a Before I can use growfs, I have two gpart resize operatio

detect mwait capabilities and extensions

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
Guys, could you please the following change? It is amd64-centric now, but obviously I plan equivalent changes for i386. I am mostly concerned about proper header files for various definitions and proper names for them. Especially I am not sure where to put STATE_RUNNING, STATE_MWAIT, STATE_SLEEP

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I f

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/02/2013 18:36 Rick Macklem said the following: > I can think of two possibilities: > 1 - ZFS isn't setting VV_ROOT on the root vnode under some condition. > or > 2 - The vnode was left locked from some previous operation that happened > to be done by this thread. Doesn't seem likely, but?

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio > > > w

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la > > > > /.zfs/shares/' > > > > issued on

CURRENT: Broken on > r246222?

2013-02-03 Thread O. Hartmann
CURRENT, as of recent Revision 246285 (see below) fails and crashes/reboots on an Ivy-Bridge platform (see below). Since the box does not have debugging switched on (not yet, will do eventually Monday), Last thing I see on screen is p4tcc3: on cpu3 then the system run dark and reboots without an

DEBUG_FLAGS broken with -jX (Was: svn commit: r244236 - head/share/mk)

2013-02-03 Thread Jan Beich
Ed Maste writes: > Author: emaste > Date: Sat Dec 15 00:03:35 2012 > New Revision: 244236 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244236 > > Log: > Put shared library debug info into separate .symbols file > > Sponsored by: ADARA Networks Does this work with -jX ? $ echo DEBUG_

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Hi, > > I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio > > work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for > > the

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Hi, > I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio > work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for > the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID > c

Re: r246057: buildworld fails with: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so: undefined reference to `std::bad_alloc::~bad_alloc()'

2013-02-03 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/31/13 10:10, schrieb David Chisnall: > On 31 Jan 2013, at 04:37, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> First, I suspected the c++ option "-std=c++11" I issued in /etc/src.conf >> when building the sources - I did this before without any problems. >> Then, leaving the build without "-std=c++11" option, I g

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: > > > Hi. > > > > > > Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la /.zfs/shares/' > > > issued on NFS client. > > > kern/vfs_vnops.c:_vn_lock() > >

Re: scheduler->swapper, SI_SUB_RUN_SCHEDULER->SI_SUB_LAST

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 02/02/2013 16:50 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> I would like to propose the following mostly cosmetic change: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/scheduler-swapper.diff >> >> This is something that bit me early in my Fr

Re: Better pkg bootstrapping instructions?

2013-02-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:46:41PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Especially on -CURRENT, it's not going to be uncommon > to see things like this: > > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y > Bootstrapping pkg please wait