Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Alexander Motin wrote: On 13.01.2013 20:09, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 06.01.2013 17:23, Marius Strobl wrote: I'm not really sure what to do about that. Earlier you already said that sched_bind(9) also isn't an

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Alexander Motin
On 14.01.2013 01:10, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 21:36 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: >> On 13.01.2013 20:09, Marius Strobl wrote: > [...] >>> >>> Uhm, there are no NMIs on sparc64. Does it make sense to bypass this >>> adjustment on sparc64? >> >> If it is not possible or not good to

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 21:36 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 13.01.2013 20:09, Marius Strobl wrote: [...] > > > > Uhm, there are no NMIs on sparc64. Does it make sense to bypass this > > adjustment on sparc64? > > If it is not possible or not good to to stop timer during programming, > there wi

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report April-June, 2012

2013-01-13 Thread Gabor Pali
FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report April-June, 2012 Introduction This report covers FreeBSD-related projects between April and June 2012. This quarter was highlighted by having a new Core Team elected, which took office on July 11th to start its work with a relatively high number of new

Strange input device (ukbd/ums) and signal handling problems with X11 on CURRENT

2013-01-13 Thread Garrett Cooper
(Sorry for the cross-post, but this applies to -current and -x11) I recently installed CURRENT on my workstation at home again and I'm running into issues where in X11 it will stop registering certain mouse events (left-mouse clicking in particular) on my MS Intellimouse (in fact, it was workin

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Alexander Motin
On 13.01.2013 20:09, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: >> On 06.01.2013 17:23, Marius Strobl wrote: >>> I'm not really sure what to do about that. Earlier you already said >>> that sched_bind(9) also isn't an option in case if td_critnest > 1. >

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ok, So everyone - what _could_ be brought into -HEAD right now, without any actual change in code behaviour? eg, what kind of refactoring could be done to reduce the amount of diffs between the branch and -HEAD? Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: [panic] Unknown caching mode 8198 in sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c

2013-01-13 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 07:56:56PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:09:52PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running a relatively recent -CURRENT: > > > > root@nucleus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NUCLEUS # uname -a > > FreeBSD nucleus 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 06.01.2013 17:23, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 09:24:46PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> On 26.12.2012 01:21, Marius Strobl wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > >

Re: [panic] Unknown caching mode 8198 in sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c

2013-01-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:09:52PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a relatively recent -CURRENT: > > root@nucleus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NUCLEUS # uname -a > FreeBSD nucleus 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #50 r244773: Mon Dec > 31 16:07:53 EST 2012 root@nucleus:/usr/obj/usr/s