Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-21 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski >> wrote: >>> W dniu 2012-12-21 13:23, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-21 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski > wrote: >> W dniu 2012-12-21 13:23, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: >>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On

Re: "Memory modified after free" - by whom?

2012-12-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
(clipping off mdf and adrian so they don't get directly spammed :)..) Crud. Continuing the processor after panic didn't work, so it might be a case of cxgbe "shot the sheriff" or something else in the stack is doing something wonky: db> c Memory modified after free 0xff8000405000(9216) va

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-21 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote: > W dniu 2012-12-21 13:23, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >>

Re: "Memory modified after free" - by whom?

2012-12-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf >>> after it's finalised/freed. >>> >>> I have a similar bug showing

Re: "Memory modified after free" - by whom?

2012-12-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf >> after it's finalised/freed. >> >> I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :( > > Compile with DEBUG_MEMGUARD in the ker

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-21 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski
W dniu 2012-12-21 13:23, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: A question related to this for those who have been doing work

Re: ports/shells/bash upgrade to patch level 39

2012-12-21 Thread Chris Rees
On 21 Dec 2012 20:50, "Garrett Cooper" wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Michael Zoon wrote: > > > Hi, > > I did update the make and distinfo file for a upgrade of bash 4.2.37 to > > 4.2.39 > > It is attached in this message. > > Could you please submit a PR for this and CC the maint

NetBSD mtree committed

2012-12-21 Thread Brooks Davis
I have committed NetBSD's mtree to the tree and am building and installing it as nmtree. I plan to replace our mtree with this version after the following steps: - Add a WITH_NMTREE build option to install nmtree as mtree and the old mtree as omtree. - Switch the default to WITH_NMTREE. - R

Re: ports/shells/bash upgrade to patch level 39

2012-12-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Michael Zoon wrote: > Hi, > I did update the make and distinfo file for a upgrade of bash 4.2.37 to > 4.2.39 > It is attached in this message. Could you please submit a PR for this and CC the maintainer? Thanks, -Garrett __

Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax.

2012-12-21 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Paul, > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 02:11:32PM -, Paul Webster wrote: > P> I only really need one question answered in honesty; > P> > P> I personally think that by forking our own version of PF we have > P> essentially made something to

ports/shells/bash upgrade to patch level 39

2012-12-21 Thread Michael Zoon
Hi, I did update the make and distinfo file for a upgrade of bash 4.2.37 to 4.2.39 It is attached in this message. Regards, Michael distinfo Description: Binary data Makefile Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

2012-12-21 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 20 December 2012 12:18:22 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 18.12.2012 00:20, Andriy Gapon: > > It's been already mentioned many times that ZFS works much better on > > amd64. It's up to a (potential) user to understand limitations of i386 > > and to decide whether to use ZFS, in what situati

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-21 Thread Alexander Motin
On 21.12.2012 14:16, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: On 20.12.2012 15:26, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-bas

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-21 Thread Fabian Keil
Fabian Keil wrote: > Alexander Motin wrote: > > > On 20.12.2012 15:26, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > Alexander Motin wrote: > > > > > >> On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: > > >>> Alexander Motin wrote: > > >>> > > Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short > > >>

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-21 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >>> A question related to this for those who have been doing work on the >>> rc(8) scripts. Can I assume that /usr/bi