Re: Is cross-world building broken?

2012-11-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. so, Nathan Whitehorn discovered that DESTDIR should be specified in environment, not on the command line. He's also got a patch to address this: http://www.pastebin.ca/2257413 So - what's the correct place to put each of the build options? Is this documented somewhere? Adrian _

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-27 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 22:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 22:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 20:16, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 12:43, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 27.11.2012 19:27, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, And

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
On 11/27/2012 12:43, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 27.11.2012 19:27, Alan Cox wrote: >> On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 19:27, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote: >> On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 >>>

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote: On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 #0 doa

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: >> Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 >> a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 >> >> #0 doadump (textdump=-201402233

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 16:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 27.11.2012 16:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 16:40, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 27/11/2012 17:38 Andre Oppermann said the following: Clang doing a manual kernel build of my work tree with "make -j8 kernel". This sounds like a "process" that may have triggered the problem. But is it the process that made the syscall in the backtr

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 27.11.2012 16:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: > >> Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 > >> a...@bbb.ccc:/usr

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 27/11/2012 17:38 Andre Oppermann said the following: > Clang doing a manual kernel build of my work tree with "make -j8 kernel". This sounds like a "process" that may have triggered the problem. But is it the process that made the syscall in the backtrace? You can check by e.g. going to frame 1

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 16:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 #0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 27.11.2012 16:05, Attilio Rao wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 #0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:229 #1 0xf

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: > Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 > a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > #0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:229 > #1 0x8033e2d2 in db_fncall

Re: panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Attilio Rao
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: > Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 > a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > #0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:229 > #1 0x8033e2d2 in db_fncall (dummy1

Re: Re-sizable UFS project

2012-11-27 Thread CeDeROM
Btw. are there any projects to make UFS natively available (something like fs-driver for ExtFS) on platforms such as Windows, Linux, MacOS? It would be nice to have native UFS instead Ext2 as universal filesystem among these operating systems... :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.inf

Re: Re-sizable UFS project

2012-11-27 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Ermal Luçi ha scritto: > > some time ago the FreeBSD Foundation published/approved a project for > live > > resizing of UFS filesystems. > > Does any know if the project was successful and any outcome from it? > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipe

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-27 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 12:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 12:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

panic: vm_object_madvise: page 0xfffffe0413c58630 is fictitious

2012-11-27 Thread Andre Oppermann
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012 a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64 #0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:229 #1 0x8033e2d2 in db_fncall (dummy1=, dummy2=, dummy3=, dummy4=) at /usr/src/head/sys/ddb/db_

Re: Re-sizable UFS project

2012-11-27 Thread Alex Dupre
Ermal Luçi ha scritto: > some time ago the FreeBSD Foundation published/approved a project for live > resizing of UFS filesystems. > Does any know if the project was successful and any outcome from it? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2012-November/042539.html -- Alex Dupre __

Re-sizable UFS project

2012-11-27 Thread Ermal Luçi
Hello, some time ago the FreeBSD Foundation published/approved a project for live resizing of UFS filesystems. Does any know if the project was successful and any outcome from it? -- Ermal ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freeb

Is cross-world building broken?

2012-11-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hiya, I'm having trouble doing a cross-build with -HEAD. It's possible this has been like this for a while. It's dying really, really early on when doing a build of the make utility. It looks like it's trying to link the make utility against a library inside the DESTDIR root, rather than the syste

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-11-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
This has been fixed too. I actually fat fingered this commit - I committed from the WIP directory, rather than the full -HEAD checkout I had been working from and had actually done compile tests against. Sorry :( Adrian On 27 November 2012 00:56, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-11-27 0

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-11-27 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 07:30:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 07:30:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-11-27 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-11-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
... fixed, btw. adrian On 26 November 2012 23:30, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-11-27 05:45:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-11-27 05:45:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2