Mark,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
M> For one thing, I'm desperately awaiting NAT64 support (the 'af-to'
M> translation rule in newer pf (5.1?), committed on 2011-10).
Backport this exact feature to FreeBSD and send patch.
M> Other: packet normalization (scrub
2012/11/20 Andriy Gapon :
> on 20/11/2012 17:06 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
> Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
> Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
> appears to
> be q
Chuck,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:33:11AM -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
C> Why not release pf2 as a port? Then those who want the new pf can use
C> it, and those that want the old one can use it.
C>
C> Or, another option is a knob USE_NEWPF during buildworld will build the
C> new pf, otherwise i
Olivier,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:24:49PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
O> > The other question that I haven't seen answered (or maybe even asked), but
O> > is relevant: what do we gain by going to a later version of pf? I.e. as an
O> > administrator, what benefit do I get by having to expend
On Nov 20, 2012 9:44 AM, "Mark Martinec"
wrote:
>
> Paul Webster wrote:
> > I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF,
> > I believe the final decision was that too many users are used to the old
> > style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause too much
confusion
Здравствуйте, Ian.
Вы писали 19 ноября 2012 г., 7:32:08:
IF> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>> I> I have this consistently with:
>> I>
>> I> FreeBSD firewall2.jnb1.gp-online.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #30
IF> r243156: Fri Nov 16
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, René Ladan wrote:
On 20-11-2012 15:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, René Ladan wrote:
since last weekend (November 17th) I have been noticing a sluggish
behavior of X.org/Xfce. Typical symptoms are:
- Alt-Tab not reacting all of the time
- pulldown/popup menus
On 20-11-2012 15:34, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, René Ladan wrote:
>
>> since last weekend (November 17th) I have been noticing a sluggish
>> behavior of X.org/Xfce. Typical symptoms are:
>> - Alt-Tab not reacting all of the time
>> - pulldown/popup menus not allowing selections with
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Chuck Burns wrote:
> The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those who want the new one,
> can maintain *it*.
This is beach front property on Fantasy Island. There isn't even enough
manpower to sufficiently support one currently.
--
Adam Vande More
__
On 11/20/2012 11:51 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns wrote:
Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options.
Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed?
The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those who want the new
o
On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns wrote:
> Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options.
Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
On 11/20/2012 10:52 AM, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
20.11.2012, 18:34, "Chuck Burns" :
On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final dec
On 20 November 2012 05:52, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> I have some problems with WiFi connectivity on my Dell Latitude E4310
> laptop with Intel card. Very often connection is broken, although
> windows clients of the same network is working fine. I need to turn
> radio off and on, sometimes th
20.11.2012, 18:34, "Chuck Burns" :
> On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>> 2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are us
On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax wo
On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
>> I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
>> believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
>> style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion.
>
> Bu
on 20/11/2012 17:06 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
appears to
be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not a
on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
>>> Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
>>> Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
>>> appears to
>>> be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not able to properly use spa_version in this
>>> context because
>> Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
>> Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
>> appears to
>> be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not able to properly use spa_version in this
>> context because spa_ubsync is not initialized yet.
>>
>> Let me think about ho
Paul Webster wrote:
> I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF,
> I believe the final decision was that too many users are used to the old
> style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause too much confusion.
I don't buy that. Think of a confusion in a year of two
Am Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:24:49 +0100
schrieb Olivier Smedts :
> Another question : how did OpenBSD managed this change ?
AFAIK, their users are used to stuff just disappearing or changing.
Remember that pf started as a replacement to ipf and the rulesets had
to be rewritten anyway.
_
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, René Ladan wrote:
since last weekend (November 17th) I have been noticing a sluggish
behavior of X.org/Xfce. Typical symptoms are:
- Alt-Tab not reacting all of the time
- pulldown/popup menus not allowing selections with mouse (typically in
Terminal/pidgin), or moving the m
on 20/11/2012 15:56 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 20/11/2012 15:34 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
>>> What about the " "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of it" part?
>>
>>
>> http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
>> http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001
Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Gary Palmer :
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
style pf and an
on 20/11/2012 15:34 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
>> What about the " "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of it" part?
>
>
> http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
> http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001.jpeg
> http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_0
Hello :-)
I have some problems with WiFi connectivity on my Dell Latitude E4310
laptop with Intel card. Very often connection is broken, although
windows clients of the same network is working fine. I need to turn
radio off and on, sometimes this does not help, I need to kill
wpa_supplicant and st
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Very interesting symptoms. I had the same until xf86-input-mouse was fixed
> with the last update. The symptoms were reproducible when attaching an
> USB mouse which caused all kind of weird X11 (re)drawing issues.
Exactly, known issue w
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since last weekend (November 17th) I have been noticing a sluggish
> behavior of X.org/Xfce. Typical symptoms are:
> - Alt-Tab not reacting all of the time
> - pulldown/popup menus not allowing selections with mouse (typically in
> Term
> What about the " "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of it" part?
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_002.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_003.jpeg
___
2012/11/20 Andriy Gapon :
> on 20/11/2012 14:41 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>> "Can not parse the config for pool" message explains what happens but not
>>> why...
>>>
>>> Could you please apply the following patch, "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections
>>> of it
>>> and try again
on 20/11/2012 14:41 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
> Hi!
>
>
>> "Can not parse the config for pool" message explains what happens but not
>> why...
>>
>> Could you please apply the following patch, "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of
>> it
>> and try again?
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg
2012/11/20 Andrei Lavreniyuk :
> Hi!
>
>
>> "Can not parse the config for pool" message explains what happens but not
>> why...
>>
>> Could you please apply the following patch, "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of
>> it
>> and try again?
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/spa_generate_rootconf.debug.
Hi!
> "Can not parse the config for pool" message explains what happens but not
> why...
>
> Could you please apply the following patch, "un-ifdef" the DEBUG sections of
> it
> and try again?
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/spa_generate_rootconf.debug.diff
I use spa_generate_rootconf.debug.d
2012/11/20 Tom Evans :
> All those files just redirect to the homepage for me...
Fixed.
Please download and view files:
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk0.txt
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk2.txt
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk3.txt
http://tor.reactor-xg.ki
2012/11/20 Gary Palmer :
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> 2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
>> > I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
>> > believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
>> > style pf and an upgrade
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
> > I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
> > believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
> > style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause
on 20/11/2012 12:45 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
> Hi!
>
>
>> Are there any other unusual messages before this line?
>> Could you please try adding vfs.zfs.debug=1 to loader.conf and check again?
>
>> Could you also provide 'zdb -CC zsolar' output and 'zdb -l /dev/gpt/diskX'
>> for
>>
Hi!
> Are there any other unusual messages before this line?
> Could you please try adding vfs.zfs.debug=1 to loader.conf and check again?
> Could you also provide 'zdb -CC zsolar' output and 'zdb -l /dev/gpt/diskX' for
> each of the disks. These could be uploaded somewhere as they can be quite
2012/11/20 Paul Webster :
> I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
> believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
> style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion.
But a change like this is expected in a new major br
Hi,
since last weekend (November 17th) I have been noticing a sluggish
behavior of X.org/Xfce. Typical symptoms are:
- Alt-Tab not reacting all of the time
- pulldown/popup menus not allowing selections with mouse (typically in
Terminal/pidgin), or moving the mouse (touchpad) results in an automat
on 20/11/2012 10:57 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
> Hi!
>
>
> My system:
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD open.technica-03.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
> Tue Oct 30 14:13:01 EET 2012
> root@open.technica-03.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP64R amd64
>
>
> # zpool status -v
> poo
Hi!
My system:
# uname -a
FreeBSD open.technica-03.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Tue Oct 30 14:13:01 EET 2012
root@open.technica-03.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP64R amd64
# zpool status -v
pool: zsolar
state: ONLINE
scan: resilvered 2,56M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Nov 2
42 matches
Mail list logo
