On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:37:45PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> > > of a bug in lib
Forward notice:
I sent this to freebsd-pf originally and did not CC -current, but as the
issue would affect current and the more opinions the better... I have sent
it here too.
-- Cheers, daemon
-- original message
Good day all,
I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgra
On 18 November 2012 18:32, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey,
>
> at the moment the current default csh prompt looks like
>
> user@hostname:directory% command
>
> This leads to an unexpected[*] result when using su (without "-").
>
> In particular the user part is *not* changed to "root" (or "toor" or
> an
On 2012-Nov-20 02:42:50 +0200, mbsd wrote:
>I've been using this layout for a long time in X and I create kbdmap for
>syscons.
>
>Does it any chance to be put in source tree? So my question is, is it
>worth.
I suggest you write a PR that includes the keymap and an appropriate
patch for /usr/share
I've been using this layout for a long time in X and I create kbdmap for
syscons.
Does it any chance to be put in source tree? So my question is, is it
worth.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> > of a bug in libutil, which bapt@ ported pw to use in r242349. The new
> > group manipulati
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> of a bug in libutil, which bapt@ ported pw to use in r242349. The new
> group manipulation API using mktemp to create a temporary file, writes the
> new group
today i was comparing the performance of some netmap-related code
on FreeBSD and Linux (RELENG_9 vs 3.2) and i was surprised to see that
our system calls are significantly slower.
On comparable hardware (i7-2600k vs E5-1650) the syscall
getppid() takes about 95ns on FreeBSD and 38ns on linux.
(i m
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:45:35AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 18 November 2012 18:44, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > Just take user name from id -nu.
>
> While that does provide the $user value I want, id is in /usr/bin/
> which may not be mounted.
> Is there a builtin which provides similar functi
TB --- 2012-11-19 17:30:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-19 17:30:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
Eitan Adler eitanadler.com> writes:
>
> On 18 November 2012 18:44, Mateusz Guzik gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just take user name from id -nu.
>
> While that does provide the $user value I want, id is in /usr/bin/
> which may not be mounted.
/rescue/id
jb
On 18 November 2012 18:44, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Just take user name from id -nu.
While that does provide the $user value I want, id is in /usr/bin/
which may not be mounted.
Is there a builtin which provides similar functionality?
--
Eitan Adler
_
On 19.11.2012 18:50, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Alex Keda wrote:
>
>> I try update my laptop - Compaq 6715s from 9.0 to 9.1-rc3
>> it cannot boot, because no HDD found
>> dmesg from 9.0/9.1 and pciconf in attached files
>
> If there is an IDE/AHCI mode setting in the BIOS, switch
on 19/11/2012 17:07 Guido Falsi said the following:
> On 11/19/12 14:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
>>>
>>> Thank you both very much for testing!
>>> Committed as r243213.
>>>
>>
>> BTW, if you
On 11/19/12 14:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
Thank you both very much for testing!
Committed as r243213.
BTW, if you have some spare time and a desire to do some more testing, you can
try the
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Alex Keda wrote:
I try update my laptop - Compaq 6715s from 9.0 to 9.1-rc3
it cannot boot, because no HDD found
dmesg from 9.0/9.1 and pciconf in attached files
If there is an IDE/AHCI mode setting in the BIOS, switch it to the other
setting.
Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > I> I have this consistently with:
> > I>
> > I> FreeBSD firewall2.jnb1.gp-online.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #
30
> r243156: Fri Nov 16 20:12:33 SAST 2012 i...@firewall
19.11.2012 15:59, Alex Keda wrote:
19.11.2012 17:18, Volodymyr Kostyrko пишет:
19.11.2012 15:01, Alex Keda wrote:
It's not build
config:
===
root@HP:/usr/src # vim /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/HP
#
include GENERIC
ident HPKERNEL
nodevice ata
nodevice siis
device atacore
device ataati
device
19.11.2012 17:18, Volodymyr Kostyrko пишет:
> 19.11.2012 15:01, Alex Keda wrote:
>> It's not build
>> config:
>> ===
>> root@HP:/usr/src # vim /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/HP
>> #
>> include GENERIC
>> ident HPKERNEL
>>
>> nodevice ata
>> nodevice siis
>> device atacore
>> device ataati
>> devic
19.11.2012 15:01, Alex Keda wrote:
It's not build
config:
===
root@HP:/usr/src # vim /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/HP
#
include GENERIC
ident HPKERNEL
nodevice ata
nodevice siis
device atacore
device ataati
device ataahci
Looks like I have missed `device atapci` here.
=
error:
19.11.2012 13:19, Volodymyr Kostyrko пишет:
> 19.11.2012 10:59, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> 19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote:
>>> ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
>>> ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
>>> ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
>>> ada0: Command Queuein
on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
>> W dniu 2012-11-16 17:17, Guido Falsi pisze:
>>> On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Guido, Bartosz,
could you please test the patch?
>>>
>>> I have just compiler an r242910 ke
On 19.11.2012 11:59, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> This warning message itself is not harmful actually, but my commit
> triggered it. It should be fixed at r243235. Can you let me know if
> this problem persists even at this revision or later? Thank you.
I see no such messages after boot at r243235,
19.11.2012 13:19, Volodymyr Kostyrko пишет:
> 19.11.2012 10:59, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> 19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote:
>>> ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
>>> ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
>>> ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
>>> ada0: Command Queuein
19.11.2012 10:59, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
ada0: Command Queueing enabled
ada0: 152627MB (312581809 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/
19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
ada0: Command Queueing enabled
ada0: 152627MB (312581809 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
ada0: Previously was known as ad4
TB --- 2012-11-19 07:12:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-19 07:12:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
Andrey Chernov wrote
in <50a88d0e.1070...@freebsd.org>:
ac> On every IPv6 address of my card and router and every broadcast and
ac> link-local scope addresses I see now:
ac> kernel: sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure (non 0 ID):
ac>
ac> What does it mean and why there are so many of them? I
28 matches
Mail list logo
