[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 19:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 19:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 19:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 19:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

HEADS UP: Forth Optimizations

2012-11-10 Thread Devin Teske
Hi Everybody, Adrian (my co-mentor) wanted some additional eyes/names for review on a patch I'm making to sys/boot/forth (patch attached as patch.txt). The patch makes no changes to user experience or functionality (but _does_ fix one incident of stack leakage -- among other things). I wrote/t

Re: [OT] Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
It's a valid concern. I need to pick up my game. Adrian On 10 November 2012 08:26, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer wrote: >> > Adrian Chadd wrote: >> > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote

Re: clang and static linking?

2012-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-11-10 22:39, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:33:40AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... - Only define isnan, isnanf, __isnan and __isnanf in libc.so, not in libc.a and libc_p.a. OK, but please add a comment about this. Where? In libc or libm? - Define isnan i

Re: clang and static linking?

2012-11-10 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:33:40AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-10 00:25, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... > > The more difficult way out is to not define any duplicate functions in > > libc.a and libm.a. For the shared libraries, this should not be a > > problem, since the dynamic linker

Re: panic with racct

2012-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:02:19 -0500 Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > I get this panic: > > Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 4; apic id = 04 > instruction pointer = 0x20:0x808f0c23 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xff83693b8b40 > frame pointer

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Brett wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:34:24 +1100 > Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett wrote: > > >Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's > > >"headlong rush" development model, I subscribed to various BSD > >

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-11-10 Thread Roman Divacky
The XNB_ASSERT is defined as a statement expression, but it's result is not used anywhere (not in a single place). Ken, can this be just rewritten as do { ... } while(0) ? Or is there a special reason why it is a statement expression? Roman On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 05:49:35PM +, FreeBSD Tinde

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[OT] Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer wrote: > > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote: > >> > >> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me > >> > a line outside of the ML and we can

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Doug Brewer
Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote: > > > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line > > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal > > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote: >> >> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line >> > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal >> > box.. on a residenti

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Doug Brewer
Chuck Burns wrote: On 11/9/2012 4:16 PM, Brett wrote: > >> Message: 11 > >> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:34:58 +0800 > >> From: Doug Brewer > >> To: Adrian Chadd > >> Cc: a...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox , > >>curr...@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm > >> Messa

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 13:42:19 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 13:42:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-10 11:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Brett
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:34:24 +1100 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett wrote: > >Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's > >"headlong rush" development model, I subscribed to various BSD > >mailing lists to see what else was out there. I considered

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Brett
> > NetBSD is hit-or-miss to build successfully, more miss than hit. NetBSD > supports GPT awkwardly but has no support for USB 3.0. > > NetBSD is rather unstable. I think I'd trust FreeBSD-current over a stable > or release version of NetBSD. > > How does OpenBSD compare in that regard? >

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett wrote: >Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's >"headlong rush" development model, I subscribed to various BSD >mailing lists to see what else was out there. I considered FreeBSD at >the time - there was a neverending avalanche of "[hea

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Brett : > Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's "headlong > rush" development model, I subscribed to various BSD mailing lists to see what > +else was out there. I considered FreeBSD at the time - there was a > neverending avalanche of "[head tinderbox] failure" m

Re: Traditional cpp

2012-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-11-10 07:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 9 November 2012 at 13:52:24 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... Looks like yet another cpp -traditional abuse. Use or abuse? Abuse, definitely. :-) A "C Preprocessor" is clearly meant to preprocess C, not arbitrary text files. You ca