TB --- 2012-11-08 05:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-08 05:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-08 01:43:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-08 01:43:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
We've asked before and Vic (lsof author) have asked and it always stalls out.
I'll cc Vic on this email.
Eitan Adler wrote:
>On 7 November 2012 17:35, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2012-11-07 15:39, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 10:32:23 -0500, Benjamin K
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:35 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2012, at 08:20, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> It's not saying that hald is run by default, merely that xorg-server will
>> try to use it by default.
>
> And will fail to detect any input devices if hald is not running, but will
> correc
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 7 November 2012 17:35, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2012-11-07 15:39, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 10:32:23 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Once again, attempting to use kernel internals outside of the
>>> supported interfaces is just asking for trou
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 20:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 16:35:22 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2012-11-07 15:39, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 10:32:23 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Once again, attempting to use kernel internals outside of the
>>> supported interfaces is j
On 2012-11-07 15:39, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 10:32:23 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk
wrote:
Once again, attempting to use kernel internals outside of the
supported interfaces is just asking for trouble; I do not understand
why this message is not sinking in over the
Hello,
Since fbsd10 has moved by default to pkgng, would it make sense to remove
all references to pkg_info from /etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes
?
Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
TB --- 2012-11-07 18:11:17 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 18:11:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-07 15:43:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 15:43:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
Has anyone noticed this with head since r242184?
% sudo service apache22 start
Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration:
Syntax OK
Starting apache22.
setfib: NO: invalid FIB (max 0)
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22: WARNING: failed to start apache22
I injected the following lines into run_r
On 7 Nov 2012, at 08:20, Warren Block wrote:
> It's not saying that hald is run by default, merely that xorg-server will try
> to use it by default.
And will fail to detect any input devices if hald is not running, but will
correctly detect them if the X server is compiled without HAL support.
On 11/7/2012 10:27 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, CeDeROM wrote:
Isn't this a Xorg bug then? When I have no configuration file Hal should
provide the configuration, so sooner or later the mouse should start
moving... but is does not..
Do I get http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/h
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, CeDeROM wrote:
Isn't this a Xorg bug then? When I have no configuration file Hal should
provide the configuration, so sooner or later the mouse should start
moving... but is does not..
Do I get http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html correct that
when I am using xo
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Ian Lepore wrote:
Before you do that, read this:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html
The page is bad here:
"Summary ... just let xorg-server use hald by default."
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE & 9.0-RELEASE by default do Not run hald
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 13:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Vic Abell (the lsof author) asked me the following:
In adjusting for clang I have come up with an unanswered
question. Where is the VOP_UNLOCK() macro defined?
I've done a full search of all the files in /usr/src/sys
and can't find its definition, but
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:27:32AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Vic Abell (the lsof author) asked me the following:
> In adjusting for clang I have come up with an unanswered
> question. Where is the VOP_UNLOCK() macro defined?
>
> I've done a full search of all the files in /usr/src/sys
> and
It exists in a header that is generated by the FreeBSD build process.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Vic Abell (the lsof author) asked me the following:
> In adjusting for clang I have come up with an unanswered
> question. Where is the VOP_UNLOCK() macro defined?
>
>
Vic Abell (the lsof author) asked me the following:
In adjusting for clang I have come up with an unanswered
question. Where is the VOP_UNLOCK() macro defined?
I've done a full search of all the files in /usr/src/sys
and can't find its definition, but I find many, many
uses.
Perhaps someone on
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> You may be interested in:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171433
>>
>> If the patch from the PR helps you, please submit a follow-up
>> to the PR.
>
> Well, actually I've just committed an upstream patch to
> x11-drivers
TB --- 2012-11-07 10:47:11 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 10:47:11 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-07 08:06:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 08:06:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
07.11.2012 11:57, Boris Samorodov пишет:
> 07.11.2012 01:14, CeDeROM пишет:
>> I have also noted that mouse cursor is very often not moving in Xorg
>> but it works in the console! I need to move cursor while statrx or
>> restart Xorg for mouse to start moving. Is it a bug or feature? :-)
>>
>> In t
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 05:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
32 matches
Mail list logo
