Re: Dynamic Ticks/HZ

2012-11-04 Thread Davide Italiano
On Nov 4, 2012 10:40 PM, "Joe Holden" wrote: > > Davide Italiano wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD? >>> >>> On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday >>> (GENERIC

Re: Dynamic Ticks/HZ

2012-11-04 Thread Joe Holden
Davide Italiano wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote: Hi guys, Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD? On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday (GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v: 9.1: 65 cpu0:timer 10 cpu1:timer HEAD: 11

Re: Dynamic Ticks/HZ

2012-11-04 Thread Davide Italiano
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote: > Hi guys, > > Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD? > > On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday > (GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v: > > 9.1: > 65 cpu0:timer > 10 cpu1:timer > > HEAD: > 1127 c

Dynamic Ticks/HZ

2012-11-04 Thread Joe Holden
Hi guys, Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD? On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday (GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v: 9.1: 65 cpu0:timer 10 cpu1:timer HEAD: 1127 cpu0:timer 22 cpu1:timer These are Supermicro i3 boxes and as far as

Re: ULE patch, call for testers

2012-11-04 Thread David Xu
On 2012/11/03 02:26, Jeff Roberson wrote: I have a small patch to the ULE scheduler that makes a fairly large change to the way timeshare threads are handled. http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/schedslice.diff Previously ULE used a fixed slice size for all timeshare threads. Now it scales the sli

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Manfred Antar
At 01:57 PM 11/4/2012, you wrote: >On 04.11.2012 21:15, Andreas Tobler wrote: >>On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>>On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: >On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: >>At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012,

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 04.11.12 22:57, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 04.11.2012 21:15, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: >> At 03:29

Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:43:13 -0600 Scot Hetzel wrote: > Not sure if your hitting the same bug, that was found in PR 112997. > > When you set CPUTYPE?=native, bsd.cpu.mk doesn't set MACHINE_CPU to > the correct values for your CPUTYPE. > > See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/11299

Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:43:30 +0100 Olivier Smedts wrote: > Le dimanche 4 novembre 2012, Scot Hetzel a écrit : > > > > When you set CPUTYPE?=native, bsd.cpu.mk doesn't set MACHINE_CPU to > > the correct values for your CPUTYPE. > > > > This comes regularly in the lists. This basically means we ne

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 04.11.2012 21:15, Andreas Tobler wrote: On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: After the commit, there was

Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:46:15 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-03 23:24, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > while trying to update from r239708 to r242511 (amd64 arch) I tried > > to compile the world with "make -j8". After a short while I got an > > internal error in the clang compile (this i

Re: watchdogd coredump

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:47:39 -0700 Xin Li wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 11/3/12 3:34 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 00:08:43 +0200 Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > >> Are you sure that your kernel is at r242511 ? > >> > >> The is

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: >> On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: >> i

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-11-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-04 19:35:19 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-04 19:35:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-11-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-04 19:58:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-04 19:58:46 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-11-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-04 19:53:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-04 19:53:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: kernel module parallel build?

2012-11-04 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 22.10.2012 15:28, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:11:10 am Andre Oppermann wrote: What's keeping kernel modules from building in parallel with "make -j8"? They don't for you? They do for me either via 'make buildkernel' or the old method. They do, but only partially. W

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-11-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-04 19:46:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-04 19:46:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2012-11-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-04 19:40:55 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-04 19:40:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [solved]: r2421600 amd64 /var/db/pkg

2012-11-04 Thread Darrel
What you probably ran into is the common chicken and egg problem where if pkgng is upgraded ports, it blows up when it tries to deinstall the package, or similarly, when portmaster is upgraded, it doesn't halt the upgrade and restart it properly. It's most likely still a problem; I'm goi

Re: November 5th is Clang-Day

2012-11-04 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 11/04/12 08:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: ... I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least) winecfg and regedit work with a clang built lib32. I'll email Gerald

Re: [solved]: r2421600 amd64 /var/db/pkg

2012-11-04 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 11/4/2012 5:06 AM, Darrel wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Darrel wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Yes, the existing man 8 pkg does not seem to match all of the facts. >> >> >> What you probably ran into is the common chicken and egg proble

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Manfred Antar
At 05:57 AM 11/4/2012, you wrote: >On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: >>On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>>On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: >>i have problem c

Re: November 5th is Clang-Day

2012-11-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: > ... > >> I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least) > >> winecfg > >> and regedit work wit

Re: November 5th is Clang-Day

2012-11-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: ... I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least) winecfg and regedit work with a clang built lib32. I'll email Gerald (wine's maintainer) about including your p

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Manfred Antar
At 03:21 AM 11/4/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: >On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: >>At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since last sunday. the last kernel that works: >>

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote: On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since l

Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?

2012-11-04 Thread Olivier Smedts
Le dimanche 4 novembre 2012, Scot Hetzel a écrit : > > When you set CPUTYPE?=native, bsd.cpu.mk doesn't set MACHINE_CPU to > the correct values for your CPUTYPE. > This comes regularly in the lists. Try setting the correct CPUTYPE for your CPU, and if you want to use "native" somewhere, add "-mar

Re: November 5th is Clang-Day

2012-11-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: > On Saturday, 3 November 2012 23:47:54 Jan Beich wrote: > > David Naylor writes: > > > There are two issues here: 1) wine compiled with clang, and 2) wine > > > (compiled with gcc) running on clang compiled base. > > > > > > Regarding

[solved]: r2421600 amd64 /var/db/pkg

2012-11-04 Thread Darrel
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Darrel wrote: ...   Yes, the existing man 8 pkg does not seem to match all of the facts.     What you probably ran into is the common chicken and egg problem where if pkgng is upgraded ports, it blows up when it tries

Re: November 5th is Clang-Day

2012-11-04 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 3 November 2012 23:47:54 Jan Beich wrote: > David Naylor writes: > > There are two issues here: 1) wine compiled with clang, and 2) wine > > (compiled with gcc) running on clang compiled base. > > > > Regarding 1), according to the wiki [1], wine does have stack alignment > > issues

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Kim Culhan
On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: >> At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since last sunday. the last kerne

Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-04 Thread HATANO Tomomi
Hi all. The point is: There is completely no way to take a snapshot of SU+J partition unless modify one's kernel. Whether some issue still exist or not, how about enabling snapshoting SU+J partition through sysctl variable? Would you mind to see patch attached? 1. Taking a snapshot of

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Could this be same problem - PR/173309 ? -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 04.11.2012 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since last sunday. the last kernel that works: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 28 12:14:38 PDT 2012 a

Re: weird network problems on current since 10/28/2012

2012-11-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote: At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar wrote: i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since last sunday. the last kernel that works: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 28 12:14:38 PDT 2012 a

Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?

2012-11-04 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > while trying to update from r239708 to r242511 (amd64 arch) I tried to > compile the world with "make -j8". After a short while I got an > internal error in the clang compile (this is a gcc-compiled system, I > don't use clang).