On 10/18/12 00:28, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 10/18/12 00:26, Guido Falsi wrote:
>
>>> Oh, hmm, not sure if it is a bug that we imported from upstream or a porting
>>> mistake. Before r238391 do_prefix variable in zfs_prop_set (in
>>> cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_dataset.c) was
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:38:07 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:45:27 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/10/2012 00:05 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 17/10/2012 20:24 Guido Falsi said the following:
Hi!
While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
portsha
TB --- 2012-10-18 03:06:09 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-18 03:06:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:45:27 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/10/2012 00:05 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 17/10/2012 20:24 Guido Falsi said the following:
Hi!
While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounting
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-18 00:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
+ Sean - who got dropped from the chain somehow.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:55 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:12 PM, hiren panchasara
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Har
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:55 PM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:12 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, hiren panchasara
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for t
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:12 PM, hiren panchasara <
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, hiren panchasara
>> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for the pointers Jim!
>> >
>> > It seems that everything
TB --- 2012-10-17 22:02:43 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 22:02:43 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the pointers Jim!
> >
> > It seems that everything works now with:
> >
> > http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_sbx_3.txt
> > http://www.struggli
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks for the pointers Jim!
>
> It seems that everything works now with:
>
> http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_sbx_3.txt
> http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/pmccontrol_3.txt
> http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patch
TB --- 2012-10-17 21:36:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 21:36:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-17 22:44:34 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 22:44:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-17 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 17:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Jim Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:49 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks Fabien for getting back quickly. As I am not clear about uncore
> > support, I've removed it entirely as you suggested. I've tried to
> > incorporate other comments
TB --- 2012-10-17 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 17:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 10/18/12 00:26, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> Oh, hmm, not sure if it is a bug that we imported from upstream or a porting
>> mistake. Before r238391 do_prefix variable in zfs_prop_set (in
>> cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_dataset.c) was always
>> initialized.
>> Now it is either e
On 10/17/12 23:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/10/2012 00:05 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 17/10/2012 20:24 Guido Falsi said the following:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
>>>
>>> portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounti
TB --- 2012-10-17 21:03:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 21:03:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
on 18/10/2012 00:05 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 17/10/2012 20:24 Guido Falsi said the following:
>> Hi!
>>
>> While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
>>
>> portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounting
>> filesystems on the fly when changing the
TB --- 2012-10-17 20:08:51 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 20:08:51 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
on 17/10/2012 20:24 Guido Falsi said the following:
> Hi!
>
> While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
>
> portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounting
> filesystems on the fly when changing the mountpoint property. This is
> working as expected on 9.x w
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:49 PM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
>
> Thanks Fabien for getting back quickly. As I am not clear about uncore
> support, I've removed it entirely as you suggested. I've tried to
> incorporate other comments too.
>
> New set of diffs, pmccontrol and pmctest.py results are he
On 10/17/12 19:24, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
>
> portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounting
> filesystems on the fly when changing the mountpoint property. This is
> working as expected on 9.x while on 10-cur
Hi!
While testing portshaker I found a regression in latest current.
portshaker depends on ZFS(when enabling ZFS support) remounting
filesystems on the fly when changing the mountpoint property. This is
working as expected on 9.x while on 10-current is not working. Problem
has appeared sometime b
Currently the sort structures in the sort utility use 32-bits counters. With Tb
files, this may be the limitation point. I can take a look into fixing that.
Oleg
From: Dennis Glatting [mailto:free...@penx.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 8:09 PM
To: Gabor Kovesdan
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org; O
TB --- 2012-10-17 09:10:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 09:10:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-17 09:10:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 09:10:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-17 06:06:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 06:06:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 17.10.12 02:06, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2012-10-16 18:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-16 18:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/u
TB --- 2012-10-17 05:35:53 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 05:35:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-17 06:13:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-17 06:13:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
34 matches
Mail list logo