[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 04:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 04:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 19/09/2012 04:48, Attilio Rao wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: ... Alternatively, a kernel patch that should work with HEAD@240684 is here: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_240684.patch I guess the patch can easilly apply to all FreeBSD branches, re

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:45:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:45:27 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:44:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:44:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:49:21 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:49:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:33:13 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:33:13 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 01:23:33 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 01:23:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [RFC] how to get real ifi_baudrate from network interface

2012-09-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:16:17PM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: M> hello, M> M> for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G M> interfaces lie about their ifi_baudrate. i would like to propose M> simple (hopefuly) change to address this. M> M> quick summary of the problem:

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/18/2012 9:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: > In addition to fusefs-kmod, Bryan and Florian have also updated > fusefs-lib and fusefs-ntfs ports. For instance, please refer to this > e-mail: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-August/077950.html > > Even if this work is someway in

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:57:30 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: ... Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to learn enough about installing/configuring vi

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:10 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > >> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get > >> committed because it locks up virtualbox

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore > wrote: > > ... > >> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get >> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to >> learn enough about installing/configu

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: ... > Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get > committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to > learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what > the problem is (offhand,I

Re: Call for bge(4) testers

2012-09-19 Thread Wanpeng Qian
Hi, >On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:37:21PM +0900, Wanpeng Qian wrote: >> Hi, here is the dmesg output. >> >> bge0: mem >> 0xfe9f-0xfe9f irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 >> bge0: CHIP ID 0x05784100; ASIC REV 0x5784; CHIP REV 0x57841; PCI-E >> miibus0: on bge0 >> brgphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 >> b

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:30 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore wrote: > > >> Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at > >> probe/attach, or during normal operation? > >> > > > > It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc devi

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore wrote: >> Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at >> probe/attach, or during normal operation? >> > > It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc device. Right. Just have it loop over say 100 times, with a 10us sleep b

[RFC] how to get real ifi_baudrate from network interface

2012-09-19 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
hello, for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G interfaces lie about their ifi_baudrate. i would like to propose simple (hopefuly) change to address this. quick summary of the problem: struct if_data { ... u_char ifi_spare_char1;/* spare byte */

Re: g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed

2012-09-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/09/2012 21:16 James R. Van Artsdalen said the following: > GOHORNS:/usr/src/sys# uname -a > FreeBSD GOHORNS.housenet.jrv 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 > r240529: Sat Sep 15 03:10:21 CDT 2012 > r...@gohorns.housenet.jrv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > I am getting an error when

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore wrote: > > >> Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k > >> times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that > >> condition. > >> > >> Also, what's that RTCSA_81

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore wrote: >> Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k >> times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that >> condition. >> >> Also, what's that RTCSA_8192 bit do? > > That should set the interrupt rate really high, to min

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:00 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Hello, Ian. > > You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: > > > > IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get > > IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Ian. > You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: > > IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get > IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to > IL> learn enough about installing/confi

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to IL> learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what IL> the problem is (offhan

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ah, what's the patch? adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:37 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-current. > You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: > > LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to > LS> build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) > LS> revision. Unfort

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:41:20: >> It looks like patch to RTC which is useful on Geode LX causes this >> hang. AC> 240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :) I'm testing theory (build kernel from fresh sources), that it is caused by local RTC patch, which he

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :) Adrian On 19 September 2012 13:37, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-current. > You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: > > LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to > LS> build router's NanoBSD image, t

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-current. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to LS> build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) LS> revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources LS> are in this u

Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-current. I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources are in this unbootable VM too :) Kernel is GENERIC. VBox config

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Attilio Rao
On 9/19/12, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao >>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao : > 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao : >> As alread

g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed

2012-09-19 Thread James R. Van Artsdalen
GOHORNS:/usr/src/sys# uname -a FreeBSD GOHORNS.housenet.jrv 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240529: Sat Sep 15 03:10:21 CDT 2012 r...@gohorns.housenet.jrv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am getting an error when attaching some disks from Mac OSX. This is an enclose of 5 SATA disks use

Re: squealing/whistling audio

2012-09-19 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Doug Barton wrote: Sometime in the last couple of months an old problem has resurfaced on HEAD, a sort of squealing/whistling sound in the audio, even without anything playing. The sound is similar to the wind whistling through something. Before I blindly go off on a bisect

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-19 Thread Darrel
It should be part of the checkout. Try: man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5 found it. :) Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10? No. So I ran mergemaster and upgraded zpool from '28' to 'zpool-features' and installed the new bootcode to ada0

Re: Call for bge(4) testers

2012-09-19 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:27 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > All, > > There were lots of reports that stock bge(4) does not work on Dell > Rx20/HP DL 360 G8. With the help of Broadcom and BCM5719/BCM5720 > users I managed to address the issue but I had to touch very > sensitive part of driver. Befo

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Attilio Rao
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: >>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao : 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao : > As already published several times, according to the following plan: >