Hello, Freebsd-current.
It is shown at top -SH output as `intr{swi5: +}' and I could not find
way to understand, what is it...
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
...
There really is no need to be so clever here. The bootstrapping issue is
going to be a minor annoyance that affects a small percentage of our users.
I think Doug's correct in this case about it being a "one-time
problem" as installing via bsdinsta
On 2012-Aug-26 12:27:41 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>On 08/26/2012 12:08, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> Maybe it could rename itself to /usr/local/sbin/pkg-bootstrap as part of
>> replacing itself, so that you could re-bootstrap your way out of a
>> problem later.
>
>That's certainly creative thinking, but I
On 08/26/2012 13:35, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 20:58 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
This isn't the security issu
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 20:58 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
This isn't the security issue I was talking about by having sbin/pkg
pass every comman
On 08/26/2012 13:02, namor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 8/23/2012 3:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
>>> /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/23/2012 3:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
> > /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
> > confusing that running the comma
On 08/26/2012 12:08, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Would this get better if the bootstrap tool were named pkg and were
> installed on a fresh system at /usr/local/sbin, so that it in effect
> replaces itself with the real thing, and has no need to leave a
> forwarding stub in /usr/sbin ?
>
> Maybe it could
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 20:58 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > This isn't the security issue I was talking about by having sbin/pkg
> > pass every command line to local/sbin/pkg.
> >
On 08/26/2012 11:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> The is the longer plan but this with also true with pkg_add -r, and the pkg
>>> bootstrap may it be pkg-bootstrap or /usr/sbin/pkg.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > The is the longer plan but this with also true with pkg_add -r, and the pkg
> > bootstrap may it be pkg-bootstrap or /usr/sbin/pkg. We have been discussing
> > with
> > Security off
On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> The is the longer plan but this with also true with pkg_add -r, and the pkg
> bootstrap may it be pkg-bootstrap or /usr/sbin/pkg. We have been discussing
> with
> Security officers and we are waiting for the plan being written and setup by
> them,
On 08/26/2012 11:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/25/2012 02:49, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>>> True. But when you create jails without the installer, you have
>>> to install pkgng by hand.
>>
>> Just like all the other ports you have
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/25/2012 02:49, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > True. But when you create jails without the installer, you have to
> > install pkgng by hand.
>
> Just like all the other ports you have to install in a jail.
>
>
> --
>
> I am on
On 08/25/2012 02:49, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> True. But when you create jails without the installer, you have to
> install pkgng by hand.
Just like all the other ports you have to install in a jail.
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:56:06AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 11:54, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:12:51AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >>On 08/24/2012 09:57, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:43:33AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 12:45, Luig
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:34:43PM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> > On 08/24/2012 07:01 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Can anyone give me he details on the security related problem?
>
> > Off the top of my head, it seems to
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:34:43PM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 07:01 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Can anyone give me he details on the security related problem?
> Off the top of my head, it seems to represent a break in the chain of
> trust: how does the bootstrapper verify
18 matches
Mail list logo
