TB --- 2012-07-10 03:50:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-10 03:50:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-10 04:39:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-10 04:39:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-10 03:01:42 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-10 03:01:42 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> I'm on amd64 r238259.
>>
>> I'm still not clear on the /usr/src/UPDATING
>> entry from 20110424 on replacing the ATA
>> drivers by CAM drivers.
>>
>> If I *do not* have devic
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm on amd64 r238259.
>
> I'm still not clear on the /usr/src/UPDATING
> entry from 20110424 on replacing the ATA
> drivers by CAM drivers.
>
> If I *do not* have device ata in the kernel,
> I have neither /dev/cd* or /dev/acd*
I'm on amd64 r238259.
I'm still not clear on the /usr/src/UPDATING
entry from 20110424 on replacing the ATA
drivers by CAM drivers.
If I *do not* have device ata in the kernel,
I have neither /dev/cd* or /dev/acd*,
even though I have in the kernel:
options ATA_CAM # Handle legacy control
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:24:52AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 08, 2012 11:02:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Please find at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/xsaveopt.1.patch
> > a patch to finally add suport for using XSAVEOPT for our amd64 context
> > switch code. See
On 07/09/12 11:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, July 09, 2012 11:41:38 am Michael Butler wrote:
>> On 07/09/12 11:22, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Sunday, July 08, 2012 9:46:09 am Michael Butler wrote:
>>
>> [ .. snip .. ]
>>
Sorry, that is the entire info file - nothing more than I've
On Friday, July 06, 2012 7:25:55 pm Kaho Toshikazu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Almost all systems use one of the IDs we do support as a _CID if not a _HID.
> > In fact, in this case it likely seems to be a BIOS bug as it used the same
> > value for the _CID and _HID. I suspe
On Monday, July 09, 2012 11:41:38 am Michael Butler wrote:
> On 07/09/12 11:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 08, 2012 9:46:09 am Michael Butler wrote:
>
> [ .. snip .. ]
>
> >>
> >> Sorry, that is the entire info file - nothing more than I've posted is
> >> logged,
>
> > For future r
On 07/09/12 11:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 08, 2012 9:46:09 am Michael Butler wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
>>
>> Sorry, that is the entire info file - nothing more than I've posted is
>> logged,
> For future reference, you can look at the core.txt.0 file generated
> by crashinfo. It sho
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 11:02:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Please find at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/xsaveopt.1.patch
> a patch to finally add suport for using XSAVEOPT for our amd64 context
> switch code. See Intel SDM for description of the XSAVEOPT instruction.
>
> Summary is
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 7:56:52 pm David Schultz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > The question remains of what to do about the missing functions. Bruce
> > > > and Steve have been working on expl and logl for years. If those ever
> > > > get in the tree, the remaining lo
On Monday, July 09, 2012 12:39:03 am Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >>> Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a d
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 9:46:09 am Michael Butler wrote:
> On 07/08/12 09:34, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 08:46:32AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> >> Sorry, no symbols but this happened twice last night while being the
> >> target of a dump over NFS ..
> >>
> >> root@ma
On Friday, July 06, 2012 4:45:55 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:46 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe
wrote:
> >> > That's neither correct nor robust
Just finished updating from r238227 to r238290 on the "head" slice of my
laptop, and was unable to make use of the wlan(4) NIC; I captured the
following via cut/paste from ttyv0:
...
Setting hostname: localhost.
Starting dhclient.
em0: no link .. giving up
/etc/rc.d/dhclient: WARNING:
Hi,
On Friday, July 06, 2012 03:24:34 AM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there have been some people here - including me - wondering whether the
> > head phone jack works. Yes, it does.
> >
> > I just have had the chance to connect
On 09/07/2012 02:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman:
>> On 08/07/2012 00:26, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Hi Rick,
I'm afraid this didnt make any real difference for me.
Since I couldnt test it on the live system I tried it on a test vm.
on the vm (
Hi,
On 9 Jul 2012, at 06:02, Steve Kargl wrote:
> If you're doing accouting, hopefully, you're using BCD.
Would be nice, but it's far too slow for financial analysis; the chip designers
go out of their way to provide fast floating point. Fortunately 53 bits is
usually plenty with 2dp max.
--
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:48:11PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> > Replying to myself just as a record, I have tried nfse and I didnt get
> > the permission denied at all.
> > The only issue I had with it is that it strictly adheres to the syntax
> > in exports(5) while mountd is a little more fle
Hello again,
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 06:35:50PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> Replying to myself just as a record, I have tried nfse and I didnt get
> the permission denied at all.
> The only issue I had with it is that it strictly adheres to the syntax
> in exports(5) while mountd is a little m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08.07.2012 15:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> You know, this is not much useful ? Backtrace is.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I had the same backtrace than Steve.
I'll buildworld again (probably not today) and report back.
- --
Jean-Sébastien
23 matches
Mail list logo
