Re: ports/bash4 --enable-static fails

2012-05-09 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > I'm assuming that the recent jemalloc updates have broken something > subtly that is now causing static symbol compilation to fail. > > ports/bash4 isn't the simplest case, but its the most obvious one that > is in my face. > > > http://people.fr

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread rollingbits (a.k.a. Lucas)
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:53:15AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > > > Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ > > as libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, > > while it is unbundled with cl

[PATCH] pciconf -e to list PCI errors

2012-05-09 Thread John Baldwin
So this is a bit hackish, but this patch provides a simple way to see if any PCI errors have occurred on a system. If we grew real AER support in the kernel we might want to then rip this out (which is why I hadn't posted this earlier). However, this might be useful as an intermediate step. http

ports/bash4 --enable-static fails

2012-05-09 Thread Sean Bruno
I'm assuming that the recent jemalloc updates have broken something subtly that is now causing static symbol compilation to fail. ports/bash4 isn't the simplest case, but its the most obvious one that is in my face. http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/bash4_jemalloc.txt Sean

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Doug Barton
Has anyone answered the original question? Are there going to be packages for libreoffice? If not, why not? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: SIGBUS in BUILDWORLD on libc

2012-05-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thanks to Jos Backus, I recompiled libc and libthr (cd /usr/src/lib/libc make make install cd /usr/src/lib/libthr make make install make #(to be absolutely sure, as I got SIGBUS the first time) make install ) and it got past this SIGBUS error. the fu

Re: MALLOC_PRODUCTION

2012-05-09 Thread Beech Rintoul
On 5/8/2012 10:26 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Beech Rintoul > wrote: >> I'm a bit unclear where to define MALLOC_PRODUCTION. does it go in >> make.conf or src.conf? > make.conf. > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/UPDATING?revision=234396&view=markup > Thanks

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Robert Huff
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >With clang, I get: > > > > = > > (1/1) Building module icc > > = > > Entering > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/icc > > > > Using system SampleICC, nothing to do here. > > Entering >

SIGBUS in BUILDWORLD on libc

2012-05-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
I'm getting the following running buildworld: ctfconvert -L VERSION wcspbrk.So cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -fno-omit-frame-pointer -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64 -DNLS -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINE

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:00:12AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Daniel Nebdal writes: > > > >> Making:    libuno_sal.so.3 > > >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by > > ../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found > > >> dmake:  Error code 1, while maki

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Robert Huff
Daniel Nebdal writes: > >> Making:    libuno_sal.so.3 > >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by > ../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found > >> dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3' > > > > That was the problem I wa

Re: panic: incorrect npmc count

2012-05-09 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > [This may be a duplicate because I forgot to update my subscription >  after changing address but I've also corrected a typo] > > (I've copied fabient@ because r233628 appears to have been the last > commit in this area). > > I've just updated

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > >> > >> Daniel Nebdal writes: > >> >  > > >> >  >        In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous s

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: >> >> Daniel Nebdal writes: >> >  > >> >  >        In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines, >> >  > return to >> >  > >> > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Daniel Nebdal writes: > > > > > >        In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines, > > > return to > > > > > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2, > > > and run "make",

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Robert Huff
Daniel Nebdal writes: > > > >        In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines, > > return to > > > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2, > > and run "make", I get: > > > >        it says: > > > > Error expanding embedded variable.

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.09. 13:01, Hartmann, O. wrote: On 05/09/12 12:44, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >On 2012.05.09. 1:21, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: >>Michael, >> >>The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, >>but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all >>older syntax

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-09 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 05/09/12 12:44, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2012.05.09. 1:21, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: >> Michael, >> >> The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, >> but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all >> older syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Nebdal
> >        In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines, > return to > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2, > and run "make", I get: > >        it says: > > Error expanding embedded variable. > >        (Per a previous message, I have re-compil

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.09. 1:21, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: Michael, The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We will update the bsdsort por

Re: x220 notes

2012-05-09 Thread Ganael LAPLANCHE
On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:29:32 -0700, matt wrote Hi Matt, Thanks for your answer. > Try setting hw.pci.do_power_resume=0 and > hw.pci.do_power_suspend=0 in sysctl.conf > > If that doesn't work for you try setting each to one > separately, and together if all fails. > > Also try setting resume b

Re: : jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0"

2012-05-09 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:59:42PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: > On May 8, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: > >> On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > >>> > >>> I hit the same assertion with r235052 and inksc