on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
> (the 3.5) with gcc from ports.
What problem are you running into?
I am able to build
Hi,
FWIW, "device timeout" may just be watchdog related race conditions,
rather than an actual hardware device timeout.
I have the same issues in ath(4). I need to fix a whole lot of locking
constructs before I can fix 'that'.
Adrian
___
freebsd-curr
On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:50:52 +0200
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Sergey V. Dyatko
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 12:51:10 +0200
> > Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> >> Please apply attached patch (also here [1]) on top of the first
> >> one, it fixes channel switching for >
TB --- 2012-05-06 20:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-05-06 20:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 2012/5/6 5:08, b. f. wrote:
On 5/5/12, Steve Wills wrote:
On 05/05/12 15:43, b. f. wrote:
Steve Wills wrote:
After updating from -CURRENT as of April 5 to one built today, I now get
a core dump running ctfmerge on libc:
ctfmerge -L VERSION -g -o libc.so.7 syscall.So fork.So..
Bus erro
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:01:19PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on eit
On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> Please try this patch.
>
> Index: fs/ext2fs/ext2_vfsops.c
> ===
> --- fs/ext2fs/ext2_vfsops.c (revision 235108)
> +++ fs/ext2fs/ext2_vfsops.c (working copy)
> @@ -830,7 +830,6 @@
On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
>
> panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex struct mount mtx
> @ /frontier/svn/head/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:4595
>
> FWIW I'm using ufs2, ext2fs, and msdosfs on this system.
I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex struct mount mtx
@ /frontier/svn/head/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:4595
FWIW I'm using ufs2, ext2fs, and msdosfs on this system. The panic
occurred right after loading the linux k
http://www.sendspace.com/file/02wler for 9/amd64
Regards,
Buganini
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
>>> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried l
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> > 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> > tried clang 3.0 and clang
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different boxes,
> all failing compiling the
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:54 PM, David Xu wrote:
>> On 2012/5/6 5:08, b. f. wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/5/12, Steve Wills wrote:
On 05/05/12 15:43, b. f. wrote:
>
> Steve Wills wrote:
>>
>> After updating from -CURRENT as of
Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different boxes,
all failing compiling the same way, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167641.
I'
Hello,
> is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
Do you know this site ? It points to some svn repository with mpls patches.
http://freebsd.mpls.in/
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
On 06.05.2012 12:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hello,
is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
Do you know this site ? It points to some svn repository with mpls patches.
http://freebsd.mpls.in/
Major number of depends are already merged to the tree.
I'm currently working to update c
very strange, I have never had these errors. Here is my steps:
1) remove old source tree and obj - "rm -rf /usr/src && rm -rf /usr/obj"
2) checkout clean source - "csup -L 2 -g /etc/current-supfile"
3) edit /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_suspend.c according to the FAQ, this
line should look like - "_
Hi,
On Sunday 06 May 2012 16:30:25 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/05/2012 12:15 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday 06 May 2012 15:04:08 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 06/05/2012 03:03 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday 05 May 2012 04:40:50 matt wrote:
on 06/05/2012 12:15 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 06 May 2012 15:04:08 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 06/05/2012 03:03 Erich Dollansky said the following:
>>>
>>> On Saturday 05 May 2012 04:40:50 matt wrote:
On 05/03/12 22:12, Artem Tuchinsky wrote:
>
>>> I will inves
Hi,
On Sunday 06 May 2012 15:04:08 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/05/2012 03:03 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> >
> > On Saturday 05 May 2012 04:40:50 matt wrote:
> >> On 05/03/12 22:12, Artem Tuchinsky wrote:
> >>>
> > I will investigate further now.
>
> Do you try to compile i915 driver int
on 06/05/2012 03:03 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 05 May 2012 04:40:50 matt wrote:
>> On 05/03/12 22:12, Artem Tuchinsky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Is it possibly that the patch got applied twice? I had some errors a
>
> not at my side.
>
>> while back that were resulting fro
On 05/06/12 01:55, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-05 17:54, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes
>> massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is
>> openldap-sasl-server).
>>
>> Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday las
Hi,
is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
what are the plan to integrate this in production use?
Thanks in advance,
--
Sami Halabi
Information Systems Engineer
NMS Projects Expert
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
24 matches
Mail list logo
